LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

alanint · 12-21-2011, 10:52 AM

I still think it is correct. The numbers were struck deeper at the top due to the curvature of the mag bottom and I still think there is a ding in the number 1.

It also follows the norm that the one matching mag is usually the "+" marked spare.

12-21-2011, 10:52 AM	#16
alanint User Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Marco Island, Florida Posts: 4,867 Thanks: 1,685 Thanked 1,917 Times in 1,193 Posts	I still think it is correct. The numbers were struck deeper at the top due to the curvature of the mag bottom and I still think there is a ding in the number 1. It also follows the norm that the one matching mag is usually the "+" marked spare.