View Single Post
Unread 07-31-2011, 01:53 PM   #15
lambermk
User
 
lambermk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 18
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Gruber View Post
Nope. DWM was forbidden to manufacture military arms, which is why the 3 3/4in., .30 cal. barrels. Rebarrelling would have to have been done specifically out of the factory. The typeface for the numbers was pretty common.

--Dwight
Now I am confused I was told the Luger that I have is a military issue, later given to the police. I have DWM 1913 w/ all matching numbers. And according to the "witness mark", I believe is what you call it, mine is perfect so therefore it wasn't rebarreled. Could you please help me in understanding.

Matthew..You have a pistol made in 1913 for the military. It was later issued to the Police and a sear safety added. Looks to be in good shape. Are there any number or letters on the grip straps?
__________________
Jerry Burney
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Ordinance on r.s..jpg (12.9 KB, 504 views)
File Type: jpg Date stamped.jpg (21.8 KB, 65 views)
File Type: jpg Front.jpg (37.4 KB, 65 views)
File Type: jpg Extractor (08).jpg (21.8 KB, 72 views)
File Type: jpg Left side.jpg (56.0 KB, 96 views)

Last edited by lambermk; 07-31-2011 at 01:57 PM. Reason: Spelling
lambermk is offline   Reply With Quote