View Single Post
Unread 09-25-2010, 05:20 AM   #15
A.Mifsin
User
 
A.Mifsin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 570
Thanks: 74
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MFC View Post
Alf,
I beleive it is 8216n. The vertical line of a 'p' suffix is taller than the line on a 'n'. Also the bottom of the line is squared off and ends abrubtly. If it were an impartial stamp because of the curve, the line would fade out.
Just my 2 cents.
Probably, as a matter of fact, Herman Historica listed the gun as 8216N. The fact that I have doubts is because I saw the serial No letters of the 41-42 range in the book The Mauser Parabellum 1930-1946, and it is clear that it is not an N, at least as illustrated in this book.
Could it be there is another N stamped that was used during that year.

Alf.
__________________
I prefer a Luger
A.Mifsin is offline   Reply With Quote