View Single Post
Unread 08-20-2010, 09:56 AM   #15
Jack Lawman
User
 
Jack Lawman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Near NYC
Posts: 428
Thanks: 30
Thanked 64 Times in 37 Posts
Default My observations

Quote:
Originally Posted by postino View Post
Jack, if a forger did the outline first and then the insides, it might get squeezed at the end...
I hear you, but if the forger engraved or somehow stamped the banner freehand, there's no way he would make all the errant strikes in the trim boxes (highlited in yellow).

The extended stroke of the midwing on the "E" (highlited in red) would be another MAJOR errant strike or cut (how likely are these amateurish mistakes on an otherwise brilliant forgerey?).

If the forger produced a roll stamp that was inaccurate, there's no way he would have not noticed the extra metal on his die which would impress that extra wing and the mars on the trim boxes... he simply would have cleaned the extra metal from the die.

I'm not up on banner lugers... is this a valuable example? In what condition is the rest of the pistol?

Could a forger have made a balls on accurate die, then doublestruck it himself? Sure! But why not believe just as (or more) likely it happened at the factory?

Just my thoughts,
Jack
Attached Images
 
__________________
Why do you guys hate black circles so much?
Jack Lawman is offline   Reply With Quote