Quote:
Originally Posted by mrerick
Back to DWM versus Erfurt...
I noticed that the tooling marks on the rear inside part of the frame (just below where the rear pin holds the toggle assembly to the receiver) is different.
The tooling that made my DWM 1916 Luger left round marks. The tooling that removed metal in this area on my 1917 Erfurt is squared.
It's apparent that the milling technique used by the two manufacturers was different.
I've posted a quick study with photographs in this forum at: http://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=24367
Marc |
Marc,
Gibson in his book on Krieghoffs makes a point to graphically illustrate the various shapes, milling, machining and finishing techniques used by Mauser, Simson and Krieghoff. Makes very interesting reading to see how these three manufacturers approached production of basically the same design. For example the milling patterns on the rear of the frame are one of his areas of study.
John