Quote:
Originally Posted by mrerick
Jason,
I'm sure that forum members welcome your postings and photos.
I understand the frustration and anxiety in the last post.
None of the members here are trying to criticize your Luger for the purpose of knocking the value down or cheating you. They are just expressing their opinions based on the information they have.
There is a huge amount of "boosting" done with Lugers. It can take many forms. The reason it's done is purely greed. A few hours work, and many thousands of dollars can come home.
Most Luger collectors have also been burned at one time or another. The opinions you're getting here are based upon experience, and sometimes very difficult experience.
This is a community. I've found it to be welcoming and to have good integrity.
- - - -
I'm a new collector too. I think you have a beautiful Luger. I frankly wish I could have one as nice. Someday I probably will.
The holster marked "bla" carries the mark of holster maker E. G. Leuner in Bautzen, Sachsen.
It looks to be in good condition. There are expert holster restorers on this site that can give more informed opinions.
I can't tell because of lack of detail in the photographs, but I think you have Haneal manufactured extruded magazines. They look right from what I can discern.
You know the provenance of the rig. If this was a "bring back" from the WW-II European war theater, it's possible that the seller has an authorization from the US forces called a "bring back paper". If you can contact the seller, ask him if he might be able to locate this.
Having a complete original rig with bring back papers increases it's value. It's not a matter of whether anyone believes your provenance or not... The papers (if they can be found) are part of the history of your rig.
One of our members is collecting "bring back stories" for inclusion in an upcoming book he's writing. If you could get details of how this pistol was acquired I know it would be appreciated.
- - - -
Photography is, as you note, a hobby / profession all to itself. There are some inexpensive and relatively easy ways to improve pictures, which is why I shared some hints in my last post. I wasn't criticizing your skills or equipment, only trying to help.
Better pictures mean that people here can be more helpful. Of course, there's nothing like seeing something in person.
Marc
|
I appreciate the advice Marc, I'll try to set up my camera and background a little differently next time. I don't believe the seller had any bring back papers for this but he did tell me the story of how he got the gun back in 46 or 47 he couldnt exactly remember what year. 1 of the reasons I'm so sure its original is, he didnt want to sell it, it took quite a bit of persuasion on my part in order to get him to let go. He had several guns, another being a byf 42 that was MINT but I knew with this 1 having 2 matching mags it was the more desirable of the 2. The seller was in his late 80's and the $ didnt mean a whole lot to him I highly doubt he was trying to "turn" a buck. And it wouldnt make much sense for the original owner to have had it redone, heck when the previous owner bought it, the thing was only 5-6 years old.