So, you mean it's harder, because the parts are smaller? But the statement "nothing saved" is still legitimate in that case, although it's a under statement.
====
[Edit] The article did mention "many parts were rejected, scraped and remade because their aspect, dimentions and/or tolerance were not perfect". Making a single gun amplified this problem. I would think that's the core difficulty, not the size (1/2, 2/5 of a Navy model is small but not tiny).
Or, I missed something?
|