LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

ieyres · 12-15-2009, 08:20 AM

Hi Dwight,

thanks for the reply. Would i be right in assuming a 1920 mark would be where the gun has been rubbed back to bare metal (to put the 2005 deact proof mark on) just forward of the 1918 date?
I didn't think too much metal had been taken off, but i'll take another look tonght. From what little i know, It would be unusual for anyone to be that desctructive in a UK deactivation.

12-15-2009, 08:20 AM	#40
ieyres User Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: UK Posts: 15 Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	Hi Dwight, thanks for the reply. Would i be right in assuming a 1920 mark would be where the gun has been rubbed back to bare metal (to put the 2005 deact proof mark on) just forward of the 1918 date? I didn't think too much metal had been taken off, but i'll take another look tonght. From what little i know, It would be unusual for anyone to be that desctructive in a UK deactivation.