LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

wdavid431 · 05-23-2009, 08:01 AM

I have a 1992 Mitchell Luger. Although it does not have the history of the original Lugers, it is still a Luger. I read somewhere on this forum that the stainless Mitchell, Stoeger, etc Lugers were based on the 1942 byf Luger with a few of the problems the 42 byf had.
However, my Luger has fired great with no problems at all. As mentioned earlier, I think the stainless Lugers work good, or they have problems. Thus, they are liked or disliked It is what you get when buying one--and unknown until the firing range settles the issue.
I have seen the stainless Luger priced from $800 to 1000.00.
I would suggest you get it while understanding it could be a dud or a great pistol.
Good luck on what ever you decide.

05-23-2009, 08:01 AM	#2
wdavid431 User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Arkansas Posts: 135 Thanks: 0 Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts	I have a 1992 Mitchell Luger. Although it does not have the history of the original Lugers, it is still a Luger. I read somewhere on this forum that the stainless Mitchell, Stoeger, etc Lugers were based on the 1942 byf Luger with a few of the problems the 42 byf had. However, my Luger has fired great with no problems at all. As mentioned earlier, I think the stainless Lugers work good, or they have problems. Thus, they are liked or disliked It is what you get when buying one--and unknown until the firing range settles the issue. I have seen the stainless Luger priced from $800 to 1000.00. I would suggest you get it while understanding it could be a dud or a great pistol. Good luck on what ever you decide. __________________ W David