LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Ron Smith · 01-26-2009, 04:50 PM

I would add that there has been extensive debate as to whether a C&R is considered an FFL. And if a C&R is allowable for shipping through USPS. It is, it's an FFL 03. The regulations state FFL Dealer to FFL Dealer. However the term Dealer is ancillary and was used in conjuction with FFL when the regs were written.

I have talked with 3 or 4 Postal Inspectors concerning the translation. One said he wasn't sure. The others all said that an FFL is an FFL, that the regs were meant to pertain to a "licensed person as opposed to a non-licensed person. The regs were written when the only FFL was an 01, or a general "Dealer's" License.

U.S. Postal Sevice. "200 yrs of tradition unhampered by progress".

Ron

01-26-2009, 04:50 PM	#6
Ron Smith User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Orygun Posts: 4,243 Thanks: 118 Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts	I would add that there has been extensive debate as to whether a C&R is considered an FFL. And if a C&R is allowable for shipping through USPS. It is, it's an FFL 03. The regulations state FFL Dealer to FFL Dealer. However the term Dealer is ancillary and was used in conjuction with FFL when the regs were written. I have talked with 3 or 4 Postal Inspectors concerning the translation. One said he wasn't sure. The others all said that an FFL is an FFL, that the regs were meant to pertain to a "licensed person as opposed to a non-licensed person. The regs were written when the only FFL was an 01, or a general "Dealer's" License. U.S. Postal Sevice. "200 yrs of tradition unhampered by progress". Ron __________________ I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one. What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said...