LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

alvin · 01-14-2009, 08:49 AM

I believe the 7-year-sentence was a WARNING sign. There is no C&R in strict gun-banning world. Guns, regardless of types, show their "TRUE" face. Criminals could use Borchardt for robbery. There were reports of robbing cabs using Mauser, robbing banks using Inglis. Not because old ones were preferred, simply because it's not easy to get a modern one to perform the "job". Guns are not layered there.

01-14-2009, 08:49 AM	#11
alvin User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,843 Thanks: 132 Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts	I believe the 7-year-sentence was a WARNING sign. There is no C&R in strict gun-banning world. Guns, regardless of types, show their "TRUE" face. Criminals could use Borchardt for robbery. There were reports of robbing cabs using Mauser, robbing banks using Inglis. Not because old ones were preferred, simply because it's not easy to get a modern one to perform the "job". Guns are not layered there.