LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

barr44 · 08-11-2008, 07:23 PM

Thanks Frank, that's good information.
I notice there is a spot of pitting where the acceptance mark would most likely be. This particular gun was re-finished, so if it were a weak stamping, then perhaps it was buffed in that area and is all but gone. The E/S on the right side of the barrel is very strong as are the acceptance marks on the receiver and the serial no. on the barrel and barrel measurements are very strong as well. Maybe they didn't always get put on the barrel and maybe if it were there it was cleaned off. Guess I'll never know.
I notice on my S-42, that the acceptance mark is so light that it is very hard to see, of course the gun is not pristine by any stretch of the imagination, but all the other marks are pretty good.
I do appreciate everyone's replies, as always it's darn good information. Thanks again, all. barr

08-11-2008, 07:23 PM	#7
barr44 User Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: york co., va Posts: 159 Thanks: 28 Thanked 42 Times in 24 Posts	Thanks Frank, that's good information. I notice there is a spot of pitting where the acceptance mark would most likely be. This particular gun was re-finished, so if it were a weak stamping, then perhaps it was buffed in that area and is all but gone. The E/S on the right side of the barrel is very strong as are the acceptance marks on the receiver and the serial no. on the barrel and barrel measurements are very strong as well. Maybe they didn't always get put on the barrel and maybe if it were there it was cleaned off. Guess I'll never know. I notice on my S-42, that the acceptance mark is so light that it is very hard to see, of course the gun is not pristine by any stretch of the imagination, but all the other marks are pretty good. I do appreciate everyone's replies, as always it's darn good information. Thanks again, all. barr