[Michael Zeleny]

Originally posted by Mauser720
At longer ranges, there are other circumstances which begin to affect accuracy. These include the effect of wind on the bullet(wind direction and speed of the wind, versus the weight and velocity of the bullet used) and visual distortion due to heat ("mirage"). While we may not think of the pistol as a long range weapon, remember that Ed McGivern used a .357 Magnum revolver to consistently hit targets at a range of 600 yards. And the LP-08 is living proof that someone did not think it unrealistic to take a shot at someone who was 800 meters away with a pistol and actually hit them. G. Gordon Liddy regarded three city blocks as "well within pistol range."

While Artillery Luger's rear sight can be cranked up to 800m, it also has a built-in, putative compensation for the Magnus Effect, moving it to the left as it rises. My understanding of the purpose of these devices is that they were meant for area fire, not individual engagement. I think that Charles Askins' Luger exploits at 200 yards more or less define the its practical range limitations. Ed McGivern's prewar .357 Magnum loads had a little bit more oomph behind them.