View Single Post
Unread 04-14-2008, 06:40 PM   #12
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by John Sabato
BTW, the notch on the front of the receiver is not a guarantee that the gun once served as an Artillery Luger... the notch was required in order to accomodate the Artillery rear sight, but I am sure that it became a standard production requirement, regardless of the intended use of the receiver, so that either a P.08 or an LP.08 could be assembled without having to address carrying two different kinds of upper receiver assemblies in stock
Actually, the receiver cut became a standard production requirement for Erfurt in 1916--ironic, because Erfurt produced LP-08s only in 1914.

This requirement was not applied to DWM, so any Imperial military DWM with the notch was assuredly an Artillery.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote