View Single Post
Unread 11-25-2007, 09:54 AM   #4
Jack Lawman
User
 
Jack Lawman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Near NYC
Posts: 428
Thanks: 30
Thanked 64 Times in 37 Posts
Default

From the Law Enforcement angle...

Picture yourself as a newly appointed Police Chief of a department that is just forming. Your firearms budget is $10,000. You must arm and TRAIN 10 officers on that budget.

You can spend $3500 on Glocks, leaving a $6500 training budget OR you can spend $6000 on a better (more complicated) pistol leaving only $4000 to train.

"Failure to properly train" officers is one of the most common allegations in lawsuits brought against Police Departments. Glocks have become an industry standard as far as hardware goes (Glock alleges that a full 45% of US LE officers carry Glocks). One of Glocks selling points (and litigation defenses) are the three safeties (drop, trigger, firing pin). They're all passive, negating the need to train operators on their use. One must only be aware of their presence and purpose.

Law Enforcement agencies are attracted to the best handgun value on the market... not the best handgun.

In my experience, they are extremely reliable. Put another way... "They are what they are."

Jack
__________________
Why do you guys hate black circles so much?
Jack Lawman is offline   Reply With Quote