DG, You seem to have a general distain for Costanzo's work, just not here on this proof, but have expressed your dislike/distrust before on his work. Of course new information will arise, great studies will come forth from his work as it did from the likes of Datig, but to cast scepticism without offering proof just rubs me a bit wrong, what will be said of your upcoming works in 10 years and how much of Costanzo are you using without giving him credit. His works are a great foundation for us today, if you question the proof in question, why disrespect great works before you without offering a firm argument based on fact....it is not the proof I have a issue with, it is your blanket unsupported thread that get to me....but you know I always value you opinion, well most of the time, and one of the few I trust with the collection list/information....edit you book carefully, misspelled words will bit you as perhaps Costanzo's HZ/HZa have done.
|