LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Mauser720 · 09-10-2007, 12:23 AM

Jerry -

Well, maybe at the time this particular edition of the "Blue Book of Gun Values" was being published, they were only looking at total production numbers by year. If that's all they were looking at, then the 1915 would appear to be the year of lowest total production. Maybe it's just another case of the informed collectors knowing more about the subject than the editor of the book. Anyway, thank you for the excellent information.

Mauser720, Ron

09-10-2007, 12:23 AM	#7
Mauser720 User Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Kansas Posts: 535 Thanks: 18 Thanked 49 Times in 33 Posts	Jerry - Well, maybe at the time this particular edition of the "Blue Book of Gun Values" was being published, they were only looking at total production numbers by year. If that's all they were looking at, then the 1915 would appear to be the year of lowest total production. Maybe it's just another case of the informed collectors knowing more about the subject than the editor of the book. Anyway, thank you for the excellent information. Mauser720, Ron __________________ Mauser720 - Ron "Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it."