Tim,
It would have been good to see the receiver top and right receiver closeup as with the left receiver, but no matter--I think there is sufficient material here to assess what you have.
Your Luger appears to be a really excellent example of an Imperial Military Luger which has been "commercialized" by removing all of its military-associated marks, re-worked and refinished, and export stamped for the U.S. market.
Imperial Military DWM Lugers have distinctive inspection marks and proof marks on the right receiver, breechblock, and barrel, and a date on the receiver. The parts serial numbers are present on the exposed faces of the parts, as you have here. Lugers originally made for the commercial market have their small parts serial numbers stamped on their edges or underneath, in "hidden" locations.
Your Luger has been rebarrelled, as can be seen by the lack of a serial number, military proof (a heraldic eagle), bore measurement (e.g. 8,86), and witness mark. This rebarrel necessitated re-proofing by a civilian proof house before it could be re-sold, hence the crown-over-N commercial proofs.
The breechblock appears to have had its Imperial military proof removed--the horizontal filing line suggests this--and the c/N stamped in its place. The general look of the top of the receiver is not consistent with the original pattern of machining, suggesting that a date has been removed. I'm confident that a closeup of the right receiver would show evidence of the Military proofs being removed.
Additional evidence of a military origin is the a letter suffix stamped under the frame serial number. Although this gun masquerades as an Alphabet Commercial, the actual Alphabet Commercial series begins in the 2000i range.
Additional support for a military origin for this Luger is the sheer number of workers' marks on this gun. Commercial Lugers do not generally have nearly this variety. The 1 stamped on your takedown lever is truly a puzzle--a numeric worker's mark would have been contrary to regulations.
Judging by the existence of a stock lug accompanied by an unrelieved sear bar, this gun was made between 1913-1916. As I noted earlier it is a very nice example of its type--most military Lugers sold into the commercial market do not exhibit the craftsmanlike care in marking removal this one has.
Your magazine is a topic all its own. It has concentric rings characteristic of a Navy magazine, and it is stamped GERMANY as an export piece. This is an unusual combination, and would be of considerable value to a collector of commercial Navy Lugers.
--Dwight
|