View Single Post
Unread 09-09-2001, 11:06 AM   #14
Kyrie
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 757
Thanks: 0
Thanked 212 Times in 101 Posts
Default Re: 1900 Luger (Con't - for Bill)

Johnny,


Respectfully and cordially, I observed that you were making factually untrue statements, and that doing so tends to reflect negatively on oneâ??s position. Both of these observations were true. If you chose to view this as a personal attack Iâ??m sorry - neither observation was intended as such.


I think everyone who has ever indulged in this kind of technical discussion is aware of how easy it is to slip into error when we are tired, or have become emotionally involved in the discussion - I certainly am, as Iâ??ve been guilty of the same thing more than once myself [wry and embarrassed smile]. Itâ??s been my experience, when I find myself in your position, that it helps to step back from the discussion, take a breather, and go back over the literature on the subject which is why I recommended the approach to you. I tried to make the recommendation as cordially as I could, but obviously failed to be sufficiently cordial and for that I apologize.


Best regards,


Kyrie





Kyrie is offline