Thread: Navy Luger?
View Single Post
Unread 08-27-2006, 09:41 AM   #26
George Anderson
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 2,531 Times in 788 Posts
Default

I think Dwight has said it all, the rear sight looks like a reproduction, the grip strap marking is very questionable, the Navy acceptance stampings are just plain weird on an army gun. The 1917 stampings are probably fake and the barrel as well.

Russell, if your gun budget is such that you must put this pistol on layaway it would indicate a sacrifice on your part. This pistol does not warrant such a sacrifice.
George Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote