LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Ron Smith · 02-15-2006, 05:42 PM

Geo, I think that the C is a mis-struck G. I could be wrong.

The "N" is, I believe a substitute for "Nr." which was used in some earlier markings as "number". I am taking a best guess here, considering that the entire marking is not to regulation.

If anyone has a better idea, I am open to correction.

Ron,
I know it wouldn't be too difficult, if done very skillfully to keep the arc of the guard correct. If you didn't do it carefully. You could spend a lot of time whacking it back and forth. And end up with waves in it.
Or even cracking it.

Ron

02-15-2006, 05:42 PM	#7
Ron Smith User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Orygun Posts: 4,243 Thanks: 118 Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts	Geo, I think that the C is a mis-struck G. I could be wrong. The "N" is, I believe a substitute for "Nr." which was used in some earlier markings as "number". I am taking a best guess here, considering that the entire marking is not to regulation. If anyone has a better idea, I am open to correction. Ron, I know it wouldn't be too difficult, if done very skillfully to keep the arc of the guard correct. If you didn't do it carefully. You could spend a lot of time whacking it back and forth. And end up with waves in it. Or even cracking it. Ron __________________ I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one. What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said...