1910 DWM question
 

I need some input in regard to a 1910 DWM. This example (9295c)is in absolutely fabulous 99% condition, all numbers match, finish is original, grips show no wear and are numbered and proofed to the pistol, etc. Internally there is no sign that this pistol has ever been fired. I have many Lugers with "mint" bores, but this one is so bright that it is the mintiest Luger bore I have ever seen. Finish is undoubtedly original, grip strap is unit marked "XXI.16." I question that a finer 1910 DWM exists. Here's the rub: The side plate is not numbered on the bottom edge, but the numbers are on the side as found in later years. The size and font of the side plate numbers match the rest of the pistol. The finish on the side plate is identical to the rest of the pistol. I have not examined many 1910 examples, but it appears that the sideplates are supposed to be numbered on the bottom edge. The photos I find in various reference books do not show numbering on the side of the side plates. However, in "The Luger Story" by John Walters, a 1910 DWM is depicted on page 132, serial 2695d, showing the side plate numbered on the side. Coincidentally, both side plates bear the number 95. Unfortunately, Walters also shows the take down lever numbered on the side, when it is normally found on the bottom. Can the side plate numbering be correct?

I have a possible reply, but first a quick question; Does the Luger have a "hold-open"?

Yes, Ron, it has an added hold open, properly proofed and numbered to the gun.

There, in all probability, is your answer. Some time subsequent to 1911, your Luger was reworked to add the hold-open device. Since the side plate does not bear the serial numbers on the bottom as well as the side, for whatever reason it was replaced and the new side plate added with the military style numbering. This could have occurred at the same time as the hold-open modification, or at a later time.

Aaron, I agree with Ron, your side plate is a replacement. :( While I don't have a 1910, I do have a 1911 DWM. It has the side plate number in the hidden position. Mine does have the hold open added and proofed.

Given that the piece is as described, I do not think there are any sad faces ( :( )required. It sounds like it is period correct and representative of the era. Indeed, if it is as described, and if there are any doubts, I will write a check for $1000 plus shipping to buy it, and not even ask for change.

Ron, I think you have hit the nail on the head. Your logic seems irrefutable. Amazing though, how the finish of the plate matches the rest of the pistol, and the font of the numbers as well.

So when do we get the see your photo essay of this remarkable 1910 Luger Aaron? :)