![]() |
K date Front Sight
![]() As a point for some of the new Collector/Shooter Luger guys
Some of the K Date Lugers (Mausers made in 1934) had set back front sights. See picture! Sight is not flush with the muzzle or even close to being flush! Interesting! Wonder why this was done? Any ideas out there? Ted http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/kdatesight.jpg |
Okay Ted, here's my 'shot' at an explanation
Since that was right after Mauser got into the Luger production business, I would think that the first bunch of Lugers required some adjustment of the tooling in order to produce acceptable manufacturing standards.
It would seem from your photo that if this is an original barrel that the crowning procedure may have required too much room to allow proper (original) shaping of the front sight base. Mauser may even have attempted to produce Luger barrel blanks before they got into the actual production of the gun and these were ultimately used in production guns even though they were not built exactly to the blueprint, they were certainly serviceable. I can't say that I have ever seen a front sight base quite like the one in your photo. I have looked at all the pictures I have web grabbed and none looks like that. Perhaps another forum user out there has another K-date that we can compare with this photo. Marvin? Tom? Kyrie? How about it guys? that's my $0.02 -John |
I don't know why, but
Jan Still's book on Third Reich Lugers shows two versions of the setback front sight. His subversion 2 and a Transitional Subversion between 2 and 4.
|
Re: Okay Ted, here's my 'shot' at an explanation
FWIW, this is a third Variation type, the K date shooter I am redoing for Bob Tracy. Nice Luger! It had been dipped blued previous and Mr Tracy wanted it to look a little more original! Thanks for your input! Would like to hear Johnny Peppers, Bill Munis, Bob Tracy's, and others input!
|
Re: K date Front Sight
Hi All,
The set back front sight as shown in the picture is fairly common and is found usually in the first 3 variations. These are the original barrels. If you look at the barrels on a 1923 commercial DWM you will see that they are the exact same length as these K-date barrels -- if the barrel was cut off flush with the front sight. To make the correct military barrel length they could not cut the barrel flush with the front sight, but had to cut it a little longer. Thus the set back front sight. These had to be old stock barrels or old stock designs. The new correct length barrels had the sight block put on a little farther forward and was cut flush. Not a very good discription of what happened, but hope you get the idea. |
Re: K date Front Sight
I do indeed Bill, the 23 Commerical Barrel length was 3 & 3/4" ? so the front sight was set for that barrel length and they didnt have to cut it back that far for a 4", makes sense! Thanks for clearing this up! Ted
|
Re: K date Front Sight
They most likely didn�´t have different size front sight blades in stock - and this was the correct distance for the blade that they had from the rear sight to shoot accurately at the required 50 metres. Patrick
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com