![]() |
Number question.
2 Attachment(s)
Getting ready to sell off a number of Lugers I have had for a long time.
I drug out a nice 1918 DWM last night and found this. Any comments? The serial # is 9638. Not enthused about this. I got it from Shattuck 20 or so years ago. Thanks |
42 was a replacement code?
|
I am tending to believe the piece was renumbered or stamped to look like an original would. I think maybe the one on the bottom is original. I have a 1910 that is numbered on the bottom like that. The "8" looks kind of funky.
I bought a number of pieces from Shattuck and some had "issues." |
Hi Mike,
The part you show should be strawed on a 1918 Luger but it looks blued in your photos. What is it? Enquiring minds want to know. Norm |
It is a strawed part from a 1918 DWM.
Straw is not in bad shape where the "38" is or the other end. The photo is dark. I am thinking the piece has been renumbered and the "42" is the original number. All else matches except magazine. I am getting some Lugers ready to sell due to age and other considerations. I will certainly address the issue when listing it. |
If 42 is the original number, the locking bolt will have originally been on a commercial Luger.
|
Two possibilities - that it is a 42 mauser code and second is that it was a commercial part
|
A third possibility, Navy locking bolts were marked on the bottom IIRC
|
Do the fonts of the outside numbers match the rest of the pistols numbers?
|
I believe you are correct, the latch is "forced" matched; whether a replacement part that was re-numbered in service, or by a later individual to produce a "matching number" will remain unknown.
Being a suspicious sort myself and considering the source, I suspect a "boosted" luger to produce a matching pistol and make a little more $$. |
I agree that this is "boosted."
I discovered this as I was in the process of taking pics for a sale. All the other numbers on the pistol look good. It came from Shattuck about 20 years ago as "all original." He played fast and loose at times. 2 mags came with it-original tubes, but repro wood bottoms. I have a 1910 that has the original number stamped on the bottom as does this piece. |
I think the font on the "42" looks like the one used to mark Mauser made armorer replacement parts.
But... no matter. I've also seen some "Ralph" specials... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com