LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   Artillery Lugers (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=125)
-   -   1914 Erfurt L P08 low serial (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=39183)

patsy57 12-18-2018 07:47 PM

1914 Erfurt L P08 low serial
 
Hello all I recently acquired a very low serial number 1914 Erfurt Artillery Luger and was wondering what the lowest serial numbers recorded are?

This is number 130

Please let me know your thoughts

DavidJayUden 12-18-2018 08:49 PM

Any suffix?
dju

patsy57 12-18-2018 09:27 PM

No suffix just Serial 130

beachbaker 12-18-2018 11:51 PM

I doubt that you will get a different answer on here than the one given you on the Jan Still forum.

Edward Tinker 12-19-2018 12:23 AM

Mine is 6441

but I doubt a lower serial number matters to most folks, maybe 1, or 10 or 100 or 1000 - something fun

Ed

patsy57 12-19-2018 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beachbaker (Post 321715)
I doubt that you will get a different answer on here than the one given you on the Jan Still forum.


I Haven’t gotten an answer on jans forum hence why I’m trying here...

patsy57 12-19-2018 08:08 AM

Ed,
Absolutely just was curious what’s documented as I can’t get to my books right now since I’m in the middle of a move... Thanks for all your help

DonVoigt 12-19-2018 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patsy57 (Post 321724)
I Haven’t gotten an answer on jans forum hence why I’m trying here...

Actually you did, and I was chastised for answering it! :p

Lowest observed number in Still's Imperial Luger book is 63.

patsy57 12-19-2018 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonVoigt (Post 321728)
Actually you did, and I was chastised for answering it! :p

Lowers observed number in Still's Imperial Luger book is 63.

Really what definitive answer was that?

I’m
Going to vent now it amazes me how people can be chastized for asking questions and giving answers. While I understand the frustration that some may have with individuals not doing their own research or having the means to do so, it still boggles my mind.

If we as a collector community chastise or flame new collectors when they ask questions or do not offer guidance what happens to our beloved hobby? It will disappear over time.

Just my 2 cents not that it matters but I had to say it.

Norme 12-19-2018 11:21 AM

Calm down Patrick, no one is chastising or flaming you on either forum. As far as I know no one so far has maintained a data base of Erfurt Artilleries since Jan Still did just that back in 1991. If you're that interested start one yourself, it's a lot of work, I should know. I've been keeping a data base on Navy Lugers for almost 10 years now and probably have many hundreds of hours invested in it.
Norm
P.S. If you need some help getting started, let me know.

patsy57 12-19-2018 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norme (Post 321734)
Calm down Patrick, no one is chastising or flaming you on either forum. As far as I know no one so far has maintained a data base of Erfurt Artilleries since Jan Still did just that back in 1991. If you're that interested start one yourself, it's a lot of work, I should know. I've been keeping a data base on Navy Lugers for almost 10 years now and probably have many hundreds of hours invested in it.
Norm
P.S. If you need some help getting started, let me know.


Thanks, the chastise comment was in reference to DonVoight, mentioned being chastised.

I think it’s a great idea to start keeping a DB, and that sounds like an endeavor I would begin. I just need to get my bearings first, since I have always collected WW2 Lugers, and the occasional PPK bank gun. Pre war is all new to me :)

Thanks for your help in advance.

DonVoigt 12-19-2018 01:38 PM

"Really what definitive answer was that?"

Where the info was found and that #63 was the earliest number reported in Still's book.

Never said it was "definitive"; there have been books with hundreds of pages written about lugers and much is still and likely never will be "definitive"; but you can be sure it will be my last contribution to this and the other thread.

patsy57 12-19-2018 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonVoigt (Post 321737)
"Really what definitive answer was that?"

Where the info was found and that #63 was the earliest number reported in Still's book.

Never said it was "definitive"; there have been books with hundreds of pages written about lugers and much is still and likely never will be "definitive"; but you can be sure it will be my last contribution to this and the other thread.




Thank you for all your help, I believed their was still room in your answer but I see I was mistaken. I appreciate everything you have said and I’m sorry if you took heat for helping me.

jcoe 12-19-2018 03:32 PM

5 Attachment(s)
Maybe this LP08 Erfurt #3 (match), will help
B Regds, John

patsy57 12-19-2018 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcoe (Post 321742)
Maybe this LP08 Erfurt #3 (match), will help
B Regds, John

Thank you!!

I will post pics of mine this evening


Beautiful!

Norme 12-19-2018 03:42 PM

Wow John, that is one superb gun! Thanks for posting the photos.
Norm

beachbaker 12-19-2018 03:51 PM

Very, very nice!!

George Anderson 12-19-2018 03:56 PM

John, that's one hell of an Erfurt. Thanks for posting the photos.

JTD 12-19-2018 07:56 PM

Just plain WOW John, that is the cats meow...... Thanks for showing it to us. John

DavidJayUden 12-19-2018 09:33 PM

I assume that it is just me, but is the barrel bent or is that a wide angle lens thing?
dju


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com