LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   Early Lugers (1900-1906) (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=121)
-   -   A Test Eagle... (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=3796)

Dwight Gruber 01-26-2004 05:02 AM

A Test Eagle...
 
...and a cautionary tale.

At this weekend's Portland Gun Show (a 2 1/2-day affair) a guy entered the hall and walked around carrying a Luger in a shoulder holster. The Luger folks who were there (not the full complement of 'Usual Suspects') told me about it in their turn--"It was a 1900 Eagle, a real wreck of a gun"..."It was in such bad shape that I wouldn't pay $200 for it"..."I wouldn't even buy it for parts"...were some of the comments I heard.

I had an inpired thought about this gun and did some research, and finally made contact with him and got a look at it. It was a wreck all right, but I looked at the serial numbers and, lo and behold, it was a 1900AE Test Eagle, smack in the middle of the core range and the Bannerman series--no question.

And herein lieth the lesson. This guy walked around for -two days- without anyone giving the gun any more than a cursory look--they saw its condition and passed it off without even -looking- at the serial number. It was my good fortune that this was the case, but every one of those folks--every one of us--should remember that its the details which make a Luger valuable, and even the meanest example could be the treasure of the day.

The Luger itself--Test Eagle serial# 6761--is truly a hard case. The grips are matching-numbered, but the breechblock has been replaced and the locking lug is a bubba-built replacement. (Actually the gun is missing the recoil spring and stirrup as well, much less of an annoyance because I have a spare original spring...)

The gun was reblued at one time in its life--the polished-out safety area has been blued over--but it now has very little finish of any kind. The photos below actually look better than the gun itself.
http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfuploa...eftsmaller.jpg http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfuploa...ghtsmaller.jpg http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/details.jpg I never actually expected to ever own a Test Eagle--despite its condition, it made my weekend.

--Dwight

Doug G. 01-26-2004 09:03 AM

Dwight, it looks rough, but restorable. What are your plans for the old girl? If it were mine I'd send it off to get a make over at Thor's. My .02

Ron Wood 01-26-2004 10:35 AM

Dwight,
You have found a true diamond in the rough. It is salvageable. Even though the breechblock has been replaced with a later vintage, the good news is that the receiver has not been notched to accommodate the new model extractor, so with the proper breechblock it will look 100% OK. The forward toggle link was probably also replaced along with the breech block since the old model toggle link has a different shaped cam that cocks the firing pin and won't work properly with a new model breech block. So if you can find both pieces in decent shape it should turn out pretty nice. I think this is justifiable case for restoration. Since it has already been subject to extensive indignities, it deserves a better fate in retirement. Congratulations on having the knowledge and intuition to bring it back to the collecting community. And I especially appreciate the addition to the serial number list.

P.S. I don't think it was reblued. The polised safety area still shows up as a machined depression. The brightness has been dimmed by the same "patina" that covers the rest of the piece.

Dwight Gruber 01-26-2004 12:49 PM

Guys,

Thanks for your thoughts. I'm not one who normally considers restoration, I'll have to ponder this further. Obviously I need to see to replacing a couple of parts first.

The forward toggle is actually the original, so thats a bonus.

--Dwight

Pete Ebbink 01-26-2004 07:16 PM

Hello Dwight,

I think it very admirable that you decided to purchase this Test piece and to keep her together...most folks would think about "parting" out this luger for its intrinsic parts value...

I think I would be in the same dilemma you would be in, once I managed to get the "correct" missing pieces...to restore or not to restore...

Based the on the fact that you are only into this luger for $ 500 plus maybe $ 200 more for correct, missing pieces...adding Thor's cost to thsese costs would yield a very nicely restored US Test Eagle that will look good for many years to come...all for around $ 1000-1200. One cannot touch a decent 95-98% Test luger for much under $ 2400.00 nowdays...

Since Swiss wide triggers and early Swiss M1900 lugers command such high dollars nowdays, this might well be the route I go to add these two pieces to my collection.

I suspect most have a restored piece or two in their collections...maybe some are not willing to admit to such...but I would be proud to own a US Test luger, restored by Thor or Gale Morgan, for around $ 1100-1200...

Regards,

Pete... <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" />

Johnny C. Kitchens 01-30-2004 01:32 AM

Is that the so called "flaming bomb" mark in front of the recoil lug???

Dwight Gruber 01-30-2004 02:22 AM

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Originally posted by Johnny C. Kitchens:
<strong>Is that the so called "flaming bomb" mark in front of the recoil lug???</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Yes.

--Dwight

John Sabato 01-30-2004 07:05 AM

Dwight, if you haven't already, check the Tech Info pages... Viggo submitted a graphic of the "so-called" flaming bomb mark and it is there...

ViggoG 01-30-2004 07:47 PM

WOW !!!.. <img border="0" alt="[jumper]" title="" src="graemlins/jumper.gif" /> .. <img border="0" alt="[jumper]" title="" src="graemlins/jumper.gif" /> .. <img border="0" alt="[jumper]" title="" src="graemlins/jumper.gif" />
A third version of the very argumentative
"Flaming Bomb" Surfaces on Dwight Gruber's
"Crippled Test Eagle" !!!!
Dwight, Could you do a closeup of this Inspectors Mark in compatable size for placing with the other two versions in our "Technical Information" page ?
John S, Would you please place it along with the others.?
Another tiny step in settling the questions that keep arising !
ViggoG

John Sabato 01-30-2004 08:29 PM

Perhaps if all who have examples of this stamp would submit good clear closeups of theirs, we can create a small study of the marks in much the same way as Dwight collected and studied the witness marks. Anyone who submits such photos to me can be assured that I will create a special place to post them. This should be a very interesting study...

I am not aware of more than one or two of these marks in any Luger reference book... this will be a unique feature of the forum.

Herb 01-30-2004 09:14 PM

Dwight, check your private messages, you have one, time is running out.

Dwight Gruber 01-30-2004 11:34 PM

Viggo,

I will be engaging myself with the photographic aspect of this hobby very soon, and I'll be sure to document the mark.

--Dwight


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com