![]() |
Luger book by John Walter revised and reprinted
2 Attachment(s)
Hi guys,
Just a heads up that John Walter revised and reprinted his Luger book as a very affordable paperback. Lots of text, don't expect a photo book. But it is a good overview of Luger history. A good starting point for new collectors. |
Quote:
I have "The Luger Book" and it is more like a dictionary or encyclopedia rather than a timelined book/magazine... |
I do hope it is "improved"; I seldom use the first two- strange arrangement and almost impossible to find what one is looking for.
I'll wait for someone else to take the plunge and review the book. |
The book shows up as published by "The History Press" from the UK.
https://www.amazon.com/Luger-Story-W.../dp/0750966270 From a reseller that imports it from the UK, it's about $18 shipped in the USA. I ordered one, and we'll see what it looks like! Marc |
1 Attachment(s)
|
Quote:
And it is a PITA as Don pointed out...Alphabetically arranged subjects, but not necessarily the more common or correctly named subjects... |
He is basically going through the years, starting with the development of the toggle lock until the American revival attempts by the likes of Mitchell and Stoeger.
He added more biographical details on the key players and discusses the most important variations. It is not a Luger recognition guide, but a narration of the history of the luger. I like it. |
Thank You~ I love luger books!!
|
Gerben,
I'm pretty sure the stainless 90s' models were all made by Aimco in Houston. Mitchcell and Stoeger were among several concerns who had them stamped with their brand, and Stoeger, since they still owned copyright for "Luger," of course had that stamped on theirs. One of mine is a P.08, is branded "OFM." The other, a M1900 configuration, is a "100 Years" commemorative that is stamped 1900 above the U.S. Great Seal on the receiver's top, and 2000 below. The former is plain stainless finish, the latter has been Cerokoted a very black black over the stainless to make it more closely resemble an original. They work OK as range guns, I suppose, though I won't shoot either one very much, if at all. The ejector on my P.08 Was ground too thin and was bent. Fortunately, a replacement ejector from Tom Heller fit and works OK. Its extractor is weird, essentially the same as an original New Model extractor--but it has no little "ears" on its sides and looks like an Old Model extractor at first glance, although it sits in the New Model style breech block. The one in mine needed its claw dressed to help the pistol eject in a manner that doesn't slam the case against the left side of the upper, which gouged dents and burrs in all the case mouths. Close tolerances certainly take a major holiday, too. The upper is sloppy, and shucks around in all directions. And the mag wells are extra-oversized, although it's possible to "fatten up" a regular mag with a few layers of tape to entice it to cycle. Even the mags that originally came with them rattle when installed. My other issue with them is their flat surfaces which were buffed wavy, and look absolutely ridiculous. I have a casual impression that the ones made for contracts with fussier clients came out a little better in this respect, Mitchell and Stoeger the main examples of this. The stainless ones seem to have been made in both calibers, and several configurations. There are pics in galleries on this site that show Navies, Old Model-style configurations and caliber, and standard P.08s, although I don't think an Artillery or Carbine was ever made. |
I would like to take a moment to Thank our hero Tom Heller who has saved my butt on more than one occasion. He once provided a crucial part on one of my lugers. I was lucky it was a non numbered DWM part. THANK YOU TOM!!!
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com