![]() |
luger aesthetics
Would it be pratical to have a navy sight on a luger with a 4" barrel? I just think the navy sight enhances the overall appearance of a luger dramatically. Just a thought.
|
Cui prodest? Only for aesthetics reasons one could replace the original stocks with rubber grips, I think it's only a matter of personal tastes, possibly not on a rare collectible Luger ... :rolleyes:
|
Brien, I'm afraid that doing so would make for a very inaccurate shooter, as the apeature of the two position Navy type rear sight is much higher than a standard PO8 and the normal 6" navy barrel has an elevated front sight base to compensate. If you wish to try it anyway, I do have new repro, cast, blued Navy rear sight assemblies in stock @$400 + $10 S&H. I also have a very tall repro front sight blade @$25 which should compensate for the higher rear sight. TH
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
There were some in such a config made after WWI for the Navy. Many used a cut 6" bbl with the front sight relocated, these have a "fat" barrel look; others used a 4" barrel. I built a clone. Like Tom says, it does shoot high, but then so does my 6" original Navy luger.:eek: I'll put in a picture when I find it! Here is what an original shortened barrel with re-located sight looks like. |
Thanks guys, I just thought it would look cool. Tom, I keep that sight in mind if I get the parts to make a franken luger like that. I didn't think about the height difference throwing aim off. Learn something new every day.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com