LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   All P-08 Military Lugers (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=122)
-   -   BYF 41 question (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=34867)

Roh 10-08-2015 04:13 PM

BYF 41 question
 
7 Attachment(s)
Greeting to all, from South Florida,



I have noticed, certain BYF 41s, the details of E/655 E/655 right receiver acceptance stamps are very light or faint, barely readable,

and on others they are very crisp.



I just purchased a BYF 41 " Black Widow" serial # 8906z, black grips, I cannot tell if its e/655/655 or e/655/135.

All the other proof markings are fine, I do not suspect that it has been re-blued.



Can anyone tell me according to the serial number, if it should be e/655/655 or e/655/135, also the approximate month/year of production.



Thanks to all,



Robert

mrerick 10-08-2015 06:55 PM

Need the suffix letter under the serial number digits on the front of the frame... sn 8906?

Also try for a better closeup photo of the proofs themselves...

Marc

DavidJayUden 10-08-2015 07:47 PM

He described it as 8906Z.
dju

mrerick 10-08-2015 10:01 PM

Ah... missed that.

The "Z" block should be all SE/655 SE/655.

The first of the ones with SE/655 SE/135 and SE/135 SE/655 are documented after about 6700ns in the no suffix block that followed it. After about 2,100 guns they were all SE/135 SE/135.

DonVoigt 10-08-2015 11:08 PM

Sure looks like that area of the receiver has been polished, thus reducing the depth of the markings.

DavidJayUden 10-08-2015 11:52 PM

I'm voting for original/unmolested. But missing the takedown retention spring.
dju

mrerick 10-09-2015 06:25 AM

The proof area of my 41 also has that soft appearance, but I know it's all original.

I think that they were overusing the dies, and that they dulled over time.

Marc

Vlim 10-09-2015 08:41 AM

I think it may be a combination of variations in hardness of the receiver, variations in buffing before blueing and the stamping of the markings themselves.

John Sabato 10-09-2015 08:59 AM

Marc, you should take some time to visit my old friend and lifetime forum member Frank Manders in Phoenix, AZ. He has been our resident Mauser expert for literally years. You two would have a lot in common...

mrerick 10-09-2015 10:39 AM

I'm just thankful for the research published by Don Hallock and Joop van der Kant!

It would be good to meet others interested in Mauser. Been awhile since I visited Phoenix, though...

Gerben's observations are also very likely reasons for the soft edges on these proof marks...

Cheers! Marc

Roh 10-09-2015 12:35 PM

Thank you all for your input,

I was researching Luger.Gunboard and came across the following information from comments in 2010.

It collaborates with Vlims's comments, if the receiver was proofed and then polished and blued... it would look washed out or faint.


BYF 41, details of E/655 E/655 right receiver acceptance stamps. In most cases the receiver was polished/blued after application of the acceptance stamps and proofs. These are often more washed out in comparison to the barrel acceptance stamps and proofs.

Jan C. Still


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com