LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   Navy Lugers (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=134)
-   -   Is this Navy Correct? (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=32295)

Jasta2 03-05-2014 08:44 PM

Is this Navy Correct?
 
Looking at this 1906 Navy on Auction Arms. Looks to be a good buy if correct. Bid starts at $2,500 no reserve.
Auction number 12684180

Sorry, I cannot make a link.

cirelaw 03-05-2014 09:37 PM

Heres your link! Eric http://www.gunauction.com/search/dis...emnum=12684180

lugerholsterrepair 03-05-2014 11:06 PM

I have a couple of problems with this one..You better look at the left side of the Navy rear sight. The WW dockyard marking on the rear gripstrap is suspect to me. If the mag is matching I would sure expect a photo of it. Something about this whole presentation..or lack of has me colored suspicious.
I have been wrong before but like I say..I want to see more to allay my negative thoughts. In the meanwhile I am sure one of the more knowledgeable Navy guys will come along.

Norme 03-06-2014 08:47 AM

Hi Bill, If you're interested in this gun you should ask for more, and clearer photos, particularly ones of the receiver rails, magazine base and a close-up of the C/M marks on the left receiver. For what it's worth, the barrel serial numbers on guns this early should not have halos, they were numbered prior to bluing, and the W.W. marking (Werft Wilhelmshaven) looks correct also, these marks are almost always pantographed, like this one. All other Navy property marks were stamped.
Regards, Norm

lugerholsterrepair 03-06-2014 10:02 AM

and the W.W. marking (Werft Wilhelmshaven) looks correct also,?? Norm, I don't see any periods..as in W.W. marking . Looks bad to me.

Norme 03-06-2014 10:28 AM

3 Attachment(s)
Hi Jerry, Werft Wilhelmshaven property marks come with and without periods, without is more common.
Best regards, Norm

lugerholsterrepair 03-06-2014 10:48 AM

OK! Thanks..Will add that to my memory banks. I appreciate it. The other concern I had with this pistol was the rear sight. From what little I could see the vertical lines don't reach down far enough? But the pic is not the best.

Norme 03-06-2014 10:53 AM

Hi Jerry, I'm not saying this gun is OK, we simply need to see more and better photos. The property mark, however, does look original.
Best regards, Norm

lugerholsterrepair 03-06-2014 10:58 AM

I understand..yes..of course. IF it pans out it's a smoking bargain at the guy's buy it now price.

DavidJayUden 03-06-2014 12:39 PM

"IF it pans out it's a smoking bargain at the guy's buy it now price."

$5750 is a smoking bargain? Yikes!

dju

lugerholsterrepair 03-06-2014 12:55 PM

David, Imperial Navy Lugers are not the nosebleed section. They are front and center..courtside. $5750 is what I have seen run of the mill 1917 Navy's sell for recently. Werft Wilhelmshaven property marked 06 would demand a little/lot more IMO. The last Imperial Navy wooden stock I bought was over 3K. Holster right around $2-2500. A complete rig will top $10,000 any day of the week. Did I mention this stuff is relatively rare?

DavidJayUden 03-06-2014 03:08 PM

Wow, I'll have to pay more attention to that stuff.
Thanks Jerry.
dju

Ben M. 03-09-2014 10:03 PM

hard to see, but the groove where the old gesichert was milled out is normally not blued but bare white metal that begins to rust. if blued in the groove, then maybe a refinish was done on the gun.

gunbugs 03-11-2014 12:57 AM

Some 06's, like mine, had the lower safety marking "scrubbed", instead of milled.

Ben M. 03-11-2014 09:47 AM

yes. still left white and not blued, tho, based on ones i have seen at Tulsa.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com