![]() |
1941 Luger with 42 code opinions
3 Attachment(s)
Hi all,
Looking to buy this 41/42 Luger w/ matching mag. It looks completely unmessed by the pictures but let me know what you all think! |
2 Attachment(s)
..
|
Nothing really jumps out at me but I'd like to see a better photo of the mag bottom. I just can't see the details.
Also, the bluing is exceptionally dark, even and shows absolutely no wear on the high spots, the side plate, etc. I'm not saying that it can't be genuine, but I'd want to look at it really closely because you're probably paying a premium for condition. Frequently these guns show different tones of bluing, some purplish, etc. dju |
Exquisite 42-41 Mauser luger! The "n" suffix is proper as well. The only thing that would make this even rarer and more desirable is the lack of the P.08 marking. This is about as nice as they get.
|
I've asked for a few more pictures so as soon as they come in I'll post. I have a 38 Luger in similar condition but it has muzzle wear and on the high points of the plate.
|
It looks too pretty to me! I might think it's been restored. If not it's a nice collectable. Good Luck! :)
|
1 Attachment(s)
Magazine bottom
|
Do you guys think it's been reblued? Looks almost too nice.
|
3 Attachment(s)
This is my 1938 Luger. Finish is great and similar to the 41 here. Bluing looks comparable.
|
I think the picture of the trigger guard really shows the crispness of the letters. If it was re-blued I think it would be hard to achieve that unless the whole thing was completely stripped.
|
Just found out this was a former Legacy Collectables piece:
http://www.legacy-collectibles.com/m...near-mint-1505 If they say it's good, it must be :thumbup: |
The mag. bottom looks good.
I still think that the finish looks like a re-blue, HOWEVER, if Legacy has had their hands on it and says it is original, then who am I to question it after seeing a couple of photos? An extremely nice gun. Let us know if you land it. dju |
Thanks all! The seller says that one grip is numbered "84" but the other isn't. Any thoughts on this?
|
I cannot swear that it wasn't reblued, but in any case it's a gorgeous gun. Congratulations indeed!
|
It looks good, maybe to good. Remember Legacy is in the business of selling. If not restored a very nice ,good as they get luger. I like a little more wear on the muzzle and sideplate. Would need a hands on by someone who knows more than me. Good luck. Bill
|
Thanks bill. What about the grip numbers? That's the only thing that is holding me up.
|
Correct grips for this gun would be numbered 05 not 84.
|
It seems to me that the numbering of wooden grips in the 1941 and 1942 years was a bit dicey. You see otherwise very nice guns with either both blank or one blank grip panel. So much so that I don't know if that should be a deal breaker. Not to say you, as the buyer, can't insist on a discount...
It would be interesting to know the numbers stamped on the INSIDE of the side plate too. dju |
2 Attachment(s)
Here's a side by side comparison of the same gun: one from the Legacy website and one the seller has listed. Legacy says that they are waffen marked but no mention of the numbers, while the seller says it's marked "84" and then other other has nothing. Not sure what the case is but these grips look completely different. Seller says he never took them apart but who knows...
|
I too would like to know the inside sideplate number. The grips would not bother me at all. That late some were numbered and some not. Bill
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com