LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   All P-08 Military Lugers (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=122)
-   -   Another 1914 HZa WWII Rework (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=31858)

phatrick88 12-25-2013 07:59 PM

Another 1914 HZa WWII Rework
 
10 Attachment(s)
Very interesting 1914 Double Date Erfurt rig that I bought from the Grandson of the vet. Notch on the front of the receiver. All small parts are Erfurt proofed but appear to have numbers re-stamped? (see photos). Matching Mauser replacement E/655 barrel. Matching E/63 Mag but has a suffix and + sign. Finish is period original. Holster is a unit marked 1915 Arty reworked Police complete with Erfurt tool.

Would like to hear your opinions on this one. I can't decide if the entire gun was assembled from spare Erfurt parts by Mauser, or if they simple reworked an old gun on hand. How much of this Luger is "original"??

phatrick88 12-25-2013 08:09 PM

7 Attachment(s)
Few more pics..

Dwight Gruber 12-26-2013 10:54 AM

Could you please show us all markings on the barrel?

--Dwight

ithacaartist 12-26-2013 01:50 PM

Several of the small parts appear in the pics to have been force matched, particularly the mag. The firing pin is relieved and un-numbered, so probably not original to the gun. Shouldn't the side plate have the Erfurt proof? Even the front face of the frame also appears to me to have been ground and re-numbered, including the double or triple struck "4". This always seems to be an issue in one way or another, but I'm not sure how it figures in with deducing this gun's provenance/history. When Arties underwent barrel changes back in the day by official facilities, did they also re-number or force match them--and how neat vs. detectable would re-numbered parts be? Would re-numbering a set of mags also be a part of that process?

phatrick88 12-26-2013 02:28 PM

3 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by ithacaartist (Post 246884)
Shouldn't the side plate have the Erfurt proof? Even the front face of the frame also appears to me to have been ground and re-numbered, including the double or triple struck "4"

Good eyes! The front face of the frame has been ground and re-stamped just like the last two digits on the receiver. The side plate does have the Erfurt proof, it's just lightly struck and didn't show well in the photos.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dwight Gruber (Post 246864)
Could you please show us all markings on the barrel?

--Dwight

Hope these help, Dwight.

Dwight Gruber 12-30-2013 06:09 PM

The receiver (at least) was originally a 1914 Erfurt LP08. The pistol was in government hands in 1920 and had the property stamp applied at that time. It is impossible to say where the pistol spent the next decade-and-a-half, but sometime after 1936 (straight-wing eagles) it was repaired at Depot 20 of the weapons depot at Ingolstadt. It was given a Mauser-made replacement barrel (e/655) and proofed here, and probably given whatever salvage parts were around in order to return it to functional specification.

--Dwight

lugersrkewl 12-30-2013 06:25 PM

Is that a police holster?

ithacaartist 12-30-2013 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lugersrkewl (Post 247220)
Is that a police holster?

Skye, you've noticed its closure strap setup is police style? There's an outside chance it could be a cut down Artie holster, as well If we saw pics of its right side, could tell if cleaning rod holder was replaced by mag holder, by the leftover stitching holes. The toe would show signs of re-work, too. I know one can sorta tell by the lid, too, but at the moment I cannot.

D.P.

phatrick88 01-01-2014 12:23 PM

3 Attachment(s)
Hopefully this sheds some light on the holster. It's 1915 dated and unit marked to Field Artillery Regiment 6. Complete with a non-matching Erfurt tool.

The Grandson relayed that his Grandfather had always told the family he got the gun off a dead German in France, but we all know how those stories go..

alanint 01-01-2014 06:12 PM

The additional stitching holes on the back make this
a reworked Artillery holster.

ithacaartist 01-02-2014 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanint (Post 247309)
The additional stitching holes on the back make this
a reworked Artillery holster.

I'd like to see a pic of the right side, below the mag holder area to see if there are extra holes there, too, from the attachment (formerly?) of the cleaning rod holder. I suspect their existence, if it was re-worked.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com