![]() |
Real or imaginary
1 Attachment(s)
Greetings Luger Nuts!!
Please take a look at these two magazines. They are reported to belong to a 41 byf Luger. The are they original? If not, why not. |
The numbers do not look correct. And stamped over a dent.
|
Frank, I don't like the smaller "2" digit. I've never seen a legitimate factory numbered magazine with digits with varying size.
There looks to be grinding grain on the "v" surface of the right hand one, and rounded edges on the left one "v+" surface. |
1 Attachment(s)
Here is a 1941 byf magazine produced not long before the mags in question. Compare the font on the 2 and the 3. Originals had flat top 3's.
|
I'm not too sure about the flat top "3", still the smaller "2" digit wouldn't convince me at all.
|
All great observations guys... but in the photographs posted, there is one other major difference that I see.
The sheet metal of the magazine tubes as seen from the bottom, appear to be two different thicknesses. If these magazines came out of Mauser manufacturing at the same time, they would likely have been made from the same lot of sheet metal which would have been a uniform thickness. One of these magazines is a different manufacturing vintage than the other IMHO. Okay Frank... tell us if we missed anything... |
Quote:
Goodness, now you have pointed it out I think you must be right, I never noticed that! |
By the v block, were'nt the bakalite bottomed, unnumbered, FXO type mag in use?
|
Okay Guys, you did pretty darn good.
Jussi16 Good Catch!! mrerick The smaller 2 was a dead give-away Tom The fonts were all wrong John I missed the sheet thickness; Good eyes JTD - Some V-Block were Police Pistols, so they could be aluminum. Otherwise you are right about the plastic bottom Additional Errors: I thought someone would comment about the messed up + sign. I have seen them crooked, but I cant recall seeing double strikes! The vertical position of the v should be the same in both magazines. Okay John? |
This was a great quiz Frank... Kudos on your selection for a learning tool...
You should do quizzes like this more often. Any of the old timers with a specific example of Luger characteristics should do the same. It is how we can pass on our lifetime of study to the next generation of collectors. I think the quizzes like this intrigue both old timers, and new collectors who want to learn. Thanks from us all. regarding these mags and your comments... I have seen double strikes leave the factory, but now that you mention it, I can't say for sure I have ever seen one on a magazine. Even on the photo of the magazine shown by tharpo, the "plus" sign is not uniform. Looks like it was created with two strikes of a straight line tool... (BTW folks, FRANK seldom asks questions he doesn't already know the answer to! :D --- if you have questions on Mausers, direct your questions to him...he is one of the few who will know the answers...) |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com