LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   Luger Accessories (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=126)
-   -   Magazine i.d. Help (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=31050)

ZX-10R 08-28-2013 03:58 AM

Magazine i.d. Help
 
1 Attachment(s)
Hello Guy's ,

Could someone help me to identify this magazine ?
Altough it's quite clearly stamped, I can't make out the suffix ( h ? ).
And what year is it ?
I'm looking for a correct magazine for my '36 S/42 #9367k.

Thanks in advance.

alanint 08-28-2013 06:08 AM

Your suffix appears to be an "e", but this magazine has been scrubbed and renumbered and is not in the best condition to boot.

It may have once had the desirable stick eagle over "63" acceptance proof, but it is impossible to tell now due to the grinding it endured.

If you want a quality magazine to complement a quality, collectable pistol, this isn't the one.

Norme 08-28-2013 08:44 AM

1 Attachment(s)
I have to disagree with Doug, I don't think this magazine has been renumbered. Early Mauser magazines were sanded at the factory prior to numbering to remove a casting line, the photo shows one of mine. The droop eagle/63 inspection mark is correct for 1936, but the e suffix, I believe, is late 1935.
Regards, Norm

John Sabato 08-28-2013 02:21 PM

Sorry Norme, but I have to concur with Doug... I think the magazine has been renumbered. It may even be possible that it really is a "o" suffix just like your magazine...

Just my $0.02

And ZX-10R,

you better charge your cell phone battery... you are down to only 15% :eek:

Sergio Natali 08-28-2013 02:58 PM

I'm not that sure that there was a previous number as "if" there ever was some sort of sanding, looks more on the suffix side rather than on the number area. But I' m not sure at all about it.

ZX-10R 08-28-2013 03:31 PM

Thank you for your information, gentlemen.
I'll try to make some more detailed pics once it has arrived.
I did buy it, it didn't cost the world, so to say.

But i'm still confused about which magazine suits my '36 best, a nickel plated body or a blued one ?

Gonna charge my cell now...:)

Norme 08-28-2013 03:53 PM

Hi Guido, Magazine tubes were usually blued in 1936, but some left over nickel plated 1935 magazine tubes show up occasionally.
Regards, Norm

guns3545 08-28-2013 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZX-10R (Post 239311)
Thank you for your information, gentlemen.
I'll try to make some more detailed pics once it has arrived.
I did buy it, it didn't cost the world, so to say.

But i'm still confused about which magazine suits my '36 best, a nickel plated body or a blued one ?

Gonna charge my cell now...:)


In your first post, you mentioned that your 1936, S/42 was built in the k-block.

The year 1936 was a transition year for magazines and therefore during the late l-block into the m-block, Mauser started delivering blued body magazines. As with all transitions, there are no clear cut changeovers as existing parts are used up over time. But, it is safe to say that a k-block P.08 would have left the factory with a nickel plated magazine.

Hope this helps.

John

ZX-10R 08-28-2013 04:26 PM

Thank you very much, this is a great help. Now I know what to look out for.


And damn, those Lugers are addictive...i'm already on the look out for another....

tharpo 08-28-2013 11:15 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I'm thinking your magazine is worn but correct. Here is another close G date "e" suffix to compare.

Tom


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com