LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   All P-08 Military Lugers (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=122)
-   -   1939 s/42 (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=28814)

efljr 08-17-2012 01:53 PM

1939 s/42
 
5 Attachment(s)
Gentlemen: Am I correct in thinking that this 1939 S/42 sn 5373o is one of the SE83 SE 63 variations identified in this forum's list of the 10 most difficult military Mauser variations to find?

Edward Tinker 08-17-2012 02:35 PM

What forum listing?

I am guessing that someone posted that it was difficult to find?

If so, then its either B&W or its not ;)

efljr 08-17-2012 02:51 PM

Apologies...
 
apparently I am not being clear. I am speaking of the sticky by Frank in the Research Archives of this forum which identifies 10 varieties of military Mausers that are the most dificult to find. My question is whether the pistol shown is in fact an SE83 SE63 variation. I would appreciate any clarification that the learned gentlemen of this forum might be able to provide.

lugersrkewl 08-17-2012 05:45 PM

Im not learned or a gentlemen but going by the sticky you mentioned it looks that way.

that luger is mint looking congratulations thanks for sharing pics.

Lugerdoc 08-18-2012 06:48 PM

The rear most eagle inspector's marking on your receiver is definately a different larger die, but IMHO this whole E/83 business is a lot of "sound & fury" over some poorly made E/63 dies. If the large SWE/63 has not appeared in later production, I could believe that the head inspector, actually changed. TH

Jan C Still 08-18-2012 10:33 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Tom
What are the acceptance stamps on the right receiver of this 1937 S/42?
Thanks
Jan

sheepherder 08-19-2012 08:39 AM

1 Attachment(s)
I also have a 1937 S/42...Just to add to the fun... :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lugerdoc (Post 218381)
The rear most eagle inspector's marking on your receiver is definately a different larger die...but IMHO this whole E/83 business is a lot of "sound & fury" over some poorly made E/63 dies...

Hmmmm...Looking at Jan's (and my) stamps...I have to say that the first stamp on the OP's S/42 is pretty sorry looking...Like maybe the stamp was right at the end of it's life and was pretty worn out... :rolleyes:

Mike B 08-19-2012 02:09 PM

1939 s/42
 
2 Attachment(s)
Here are a couple of pictures of another 1939 S/42; serial number 176o. Hope this adds some to your discussion.

Mike


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com