LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   New Collectors Forum (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=133)
-   -   German markings (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=27348)

Mpws 12-15-2011 05:02 AM

German markings
 
Was there any circumstances where a WW2 era luger would be used/circulated not having german markings on it -specifically a Mauser made variety ?
From what I read in that time peroid required german proof markings.
Any feedback would be appreciated.

alanint 12-15-2011 06:58 AM

By "not having any German marks on it" do you mean NO marks? Because ANY mark placed on a WW2 era Luger would be a German mark.
If you mean nazi era acceptance stamps or other arsenal or factory stamps; there have been pistols that have turned up, which collectors call "lunch box specials" which were smuggled out of the factory in pieces and assembled later. These will bear either no or very few marks.

Mpws 12-15-2011 10:44 AM

Yes no german arsenal stamps etc. I am working on the pictures and will post when I have good ones to look at.

Mpws 01-02-2012 05:43 AM

10 Attachment(s)
I have some decent pictures to look at.

Mpws 01-02-2012 05:46 AM

5 Attachment(s)
A few more. The straw color is strong but the pictures do not show that.

Edward Tinker 01-02-2012 08:31 AM

It is a finished commercial luger that went into military service (see the Mauser banner and exterior marking of the serial numbers).

I would be amazed if there were not at least eagle N markings on it, at least originally it HAD to have them, or it would not have made it into military service. In addition to a single proof Eagle most likely on the barrel right, right receiver or left toggle????

Anything is possible, but very doubtful to me....


Ed

Mpws 01-02-2012 10:01 AM

I looked with a magnifying glass along the right side of the gun and left side toggle (except #35 on the pin)and see nothing and there is no indication of metal being removed. I have not diassembled it completely but I see no other markings then what I tried to show in the picutres.
The barrel blue does not match the rest of the gun so would that explain missing marks if it the barrel was replaced ? I hope the pics were ok.

alanint 01-02-2012 10:57 AM

Although commercial, would this gun have retained strawing at that late date?

What about the "42" chamber date along with Mauser marked toggle?

rivieraranch 01-02-2012 01:02 PM

It would be better to say "markings" because Marks are German currency.

Mpws 01-02-2012 02:02 PM

Yes I will use markings in the future. I appreciate the feedback on my post.

MFC 01-03-2012 02:11 AM

On page 331 of Hallock and van de Kant's 'The Mauser Parabellum' there is another example and rack mate to your Luger. It is classified as a Mauser Commercial Banner, and is a "late war assembled commercial"...
Serial #9232w, only three guns apart from yours.
No proofs
Military (42) dated receiver and military P.08 coded frame
Square dot betwwen P and 08 on frame indicating 1942 manufacture
Rounded edges of late front toggle link
Strawed parts
Bakelite grips
There is another example with no proofs on page 333 which is very similar. S#9323w. Military (42) dated receiver, but has a rounded dot between the P and 08 on the frame, indicating 1941 manufacture.

Mpws 01-03-2012 04:18 AM

A definite square dot after the P

ken d 01-03-2012 04:46 PM

Look at the front sight base. It may have an E/N or C/U

Ken D

Mpws 01-03-2012 06:47 PM

Without removing the front sight there is no letter pattern as described- but is this because it is not the original barrel ?

MFC 01-03-2012 10:17 PM

Hi Michael,
I forgot to mention, both examples I discribed above have barrels stamped with the bore gage only. No serial #'s, like yours. Except for one digit of the S#, your Luger is exactly the same as #9232w, on page 331. I believe it is all original including the barrel.

Mpws 01-04-2012 04:26 AM

It gets interesting. Is there an estimate of how many that were put out in circulation ? Would this be a war gun or does that go under anything is possible ? The grips indicate to me honest wear.
Thank you again everyone.

MFC 01-05-2012 02:48 AM

Technically it is a commercial. There are no military or police acceptance stamps.

Mpws 01-05-2012 04:30 AM

So going back to what Ed has said--just to be clear, if a luger was used in an official capacity such as military or police it had to have a stamp that coincides with that.

Besides not having military/police markings and some straw colored components is there any difference mechanically or functionality that the commercial version has over the military equivalent ?

MFC 01-06-2012 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mpws (Post 205629)
So going back to what Ed has said--just to be clear, if a luger was used in an official capacity such as military or police it had to have a stamp that coincides with that.

Yes, they are supposed to. The thing about these is, commercials are supposed to have Eagle/N proofs (commercial Nitro firing proofs) also. With the Banner toggle, strawed parts and S# range, they were made as commercials. They could have been used by the military but, there is no way to prove it

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mpws (Post 205629)
Besides not having military/police markings and some straw colored components is there any difference mechanically or functionality that the commercial version has over the military equivalent ?

No.

Mpws 01-06-2012 04:22 AM

I am having a difficult time trying to imagine who would buy a a firearm (commercial) in that time era because of money-I know there is ignorance on my part. Can anyone give a rough estimate to how much this would have cost in US currency ?

What should I compare this to in order to get a current value ? I have been rummaging around and have not found comparable. It could be that I am looking in the wrong areas.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com