![]() |
Dutch Justice department drops Sig-Sauer
1 Attachment(s)
This is just in:
The purchase of the new replacement service pistol of the Dutch police, a Sig Sauer, has been cancelled. The pistol does not meet the requirements, according to minister of Safety and Justice, Ivo Opstelten. He feels it is no longer responsible to continue with this pistol, there is insufficient trust in the reliability of it, which can endanger the safety of the police officers on the street. The new pistol suffers from too many malfunctions, which was confirmed by tests conducted by the Ulm proof house. The pistol was tested four times, all times "Sig-Sauer was not able to replicate the quality of the pistol that won them the contract" according to the minister. This will mean a serious delay of the replacement of the current service pistols, the Walther P5 and the Glock 17. |
This is what happens when manufacturers are pushed to develop "safer and safer" DAO, triple safety disconnect, idiot proof, etc. pistols.
|
Although I favor the Hi Power, what is wrong with the Walther P5 and the Glock 17 that they need to be replaced?
|
The Walther P5 suffers from increased barrel wear due to the 'action' ammunition that is in use since the late 1980s. This already caused the special arrest teams to switch to the Glock 17, but it has not enough safety features for the average police officer.
|
I don't mean this to be a silly question, but if there is increased barrel wear, why not just replace the barrel. It would be a lot cheaper.
I was starting to get barrel wear on a Hi Power once and I just changed the barrel and used a milder ammunication. |
I can't imagine the average police officer ever firing enough ammunition in an entire career to cause noticeable barrel wear. Better barrels are in order.
I imagine that Glock's Polygonal rifling is better suited to this ammo? Vlim, do you have a link to this story in English? I have friends who would be interested. Thanks! |
If memory serves, the Walther P5's have been in service for 30 years with the Dutch National Police. That is a long stint by any measure.
As a side note, the SIG P250 has a less than sterling reputation (I am being diplomatic) amongst many in the firearms community. The P250 has failed spectacularly more than once during testing for large law enforcement style contracts. It was a solution looking for a problem. And SIGs marketing and follow through of the pistol was, shall we say, less than optimum. Ez |
Quote:
|
Did they even consider CZ pistols?
|
Quote:
Ez |
One of the problems is that they are not allowed, by law, to make their own choice. They have to allow all companies to make an offer and select the best one from the lot. The best one usually being the cheapest one :)
EU-legislation at it's worst. We are no longer able to protect our own markets or to select companies for their proven track-record. Well, the result is clear. Northern European countries are being bled dry by Eastern European and Southern European countries leeching off of us. Some call that progress. |
They should go Hk (Heckler and Koch).
http://i44.tinypic.com/9hhnxh.jpg SIG's quality has really been lacking the last few years. |
If the Dutch authorities used the CZ-75, we wouldn't be seeing this thread.
|
This is just in:
It seems that the Dutch police have opted for the runner-up. The contract for 40,000 police pistols will now go to Heckler & Koch, for a modified version of their P30 pistol. |
Probably works like my Volkswagen -:) Don't know what's in those German's mind -- if not strong on electronics, then why don't keep it simple? With all those troublesome sensors generating false alarms, I have to "repair" it to turn off the checking engine light to pass car inspection every year.
|
I knew it! Hk wins as usual. They have some of the greatest firearms in the world.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com