LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   All P-08 Military Lugers (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=122)
-   -   Luger on gunbroker. (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=21580)

wayne8661 04-26-2009 11:05 PM

Luger on gunbroker.
 
http://gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewIte...Item=127414722

I found this luger interesting but I cant find any info about it. Is this a good pistol? I found info on 1906 Bulgarian contracts but I got zilch on 1908. Actually I cant find anything with the DWM on the chamber . Would you gentlemen care to school a novice?

Edward Tinker 04-26-2009 11:14 PM

I just missed this one at the Gettysburg auction. I was there and left to go do family stuff, came back and missed the pistol by 5 or 6 auctions.


Bulgarians are not very well known, but when they are, they are marked like this, with the DWM stamped here.

I heard this went for around $1500, so would guess the reserve is slightly or more so higher.

I would have bid up to $1500, although I am no Bulgarian expert.


Ed

wayne8661 04-26-2009 11:17 PM

Mr Tinker what do you make of the mismatch on the barrel and extractor could that be from an arsenal refurb?

Edward Tinker 04-26-2009 11:23 PM

Hard to say, anytime the numbers are wrong then any story could be made up.


From my limited knowledge, I would say it has the Bulgarian signs, DWM, Crest, Russian on safety, lanyard loop in different place.

What I am unsure of is what serial numbers are considered Bulgarians...


Ed

Ron Wood 04-27-2009 12:29 AM

The write up is correct, 1908 Bulgarians were made in two series 1-5000 and 1C-5000C. Actually, 1908 is a misnomer as the guns were contracted for and delivered in late 1910/early 1911. They were relatively unknown to collectors (even Harry Jones knew of only two examples when he published his book in 1959) and they were labled 1908 because they resembled the 1908 models without a stock lug. The safety marking is Bulgarian and Russian. It is the word for "FIRE". It is the same word in both languages and being pre-1917 the Cyrillic alphabet was the same in both languages. Further, the Bulgarian Lugers departed from the normal safety marking in that when the marking shows on any other Luger, the Luger is on safe (GESICHERT), but on the Bulgarians (and Russians) when the marking shows the gun is ready to fire.

I doubt that the mis-matched parts are the result of an arsenal refurb (notice that in addition to the barrel and extractor, the sear bar is also #72). There were a bunch of these guns brought into the US in the '60s, reportedly many of them in barrels and many in not very good condition. The good ones and as many that could be assembled into functioning pieces were sold through Ye Olde Hunter and other dealers (for about $39.00 as I recall). Many of the parts were sold off seperately and are found on all manner of shooter Lugers to this day. They are really neat and unique Lugers and, even in the condition of this one, quite collectable.

wayne8661 04-27-2009 12:32 AM

Thanx a million Ron

Michael Zeleny 04-27-2009 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Wood (Post 158571)
The safety marking is Bulgarian and Russian. It is the word for "FIRE". It is the same word in both languages and being pre-1917 the Cyrillic alphabet was the same in both languages. Further, the Bulgarian Lugers departed from the normal safety marking in that when the marking shows on any other Luger, the Luger is on safe (GESICHERT), but on the Bulgarians (and Russians) when the marking shows the gun is ready to fire.

Not quite. The exposed ОГЪНЪ does indicate the safety lever position for FIRE in Bulgarian spelling. But the Russian spelling would be ОГОНЬ. These Wikipedia pages explain the roles of the hard and soft signs in Cyrillic alphabets:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_sign

Ron Wood 04-27-2009 01:11 PM

Mike,
I appreciate the references. My understanding is that the Russian Cyrillic alphabet underwent a standardization process in the 1916-1917 timeframe which would have resulted in the distinction between the Bulgarian and Russian spelling that you pointed out. I have been informed by others (perhaps incorrectly, I have no way of confirming) that prior to that time the spelling was the same.

Michael Zeleny 04-27-2009 01:21 PM

The difference in Bulgarian spelling is due to a variation in phonetics unrelated to the Russian spelling reforms.

Ron Wood 04-27-2009 01:53 PM

Interesting. I do not speak either language, so I am only going by information from an old Russian gentleman I received well over 20 years ago when I obtained my first Bulgarian Luger. According to him, the word was pronounced the same (a rough phonetic approximation would be ah-go-in) in both languages and was therefore spelled the same.

Michael Zeleny 04-28-2009 12:12 AM

The word is pronounced the same in both languages, but its spelling differs because the Bulgarian Ъ retains the phonetic value of a vowel, unlike its modern Russian counterpart.

Ron Wood 04-28-2009 01:12 AM

OK, so let's continue my education. Is ОГОНЬ the modern Russian spelling, or is it the pre-1917 spelling?

Michael Zeleny 04-28-2009 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Wood (Post 158629)
OK, so let's continue my education. Is ОГОНЬ the modern Russian spelling, or is it the pre-1917 spelling?

It's both.

Ron Wood 04-28-2009 02:13 AM

Thanks.:)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com