unit marking on a 1921 dwm
hi there,
got a 1921 dwm, s/n 8xxxx (5digits, no suffix) with an unit marking S.A.5.F.28. has anybody an idea about its meaning? as far as i know during this time no unit markings should have been done during that time (new order in 1922 then). its a bit dubious for me. besides it is reblued, gun seems not to be a fake. thanks klaus |
Guten Tag Klaus,
does your Luger have a sear safety? I'm sure someone with more knowledge about markings will share their wisdom, for that it's worth, I'm guessing a Prussian police luger. btw. what does "Extra Bavariam nulla vita, et si est vita, non est ita" mean? |
guten tag nach norwegen :bigbye:
no, it hasn't. latin, it means, that there is no such a good life outside from bavarian :D regards klaus |
Hi Klaus,
Without being able to see it. I think it is a Reichswehr marking for: Sanit�¤ts Abteilung 5 Fahrpersonal weapon #28 Can you post some clear photos of the pistol? What are the proof marks on the right side of the received? Ron |
hi ron
proof marks are not clear to recognize good to see is : "dove" "dove" "eagle" what letters and numbers is only a guess on the breechblock the "dove" has a "waa4" im not sure, but i think, an i@*!t :grr: had polished the gun, before it was blued again, cause the stamps are so hard to recognize. i will try to make a few pics then regards klaus |
Servus Klaus...Wo in Bayern? Meine Familie stammt aus U-Gau.
|
servus augsburger :bigbye:
n�¤he m�¼nchen gr�¼�?e klaus |
Klaus,
Dove WaA4 proofs would indicate 1921 production. It does sound like it has been refinished. Ron |
ron,
yes, i think so too. my opinion cause this version is not so easy to find: better a bad (refinished) one than none for the collection only the unit stamp makes worries, cause it does not fit to the order from 1923 pics will follow... regards klas |
Extra Bavariam nulla vita, et si est vita, non est ita
I don't know if I agree totally, but germany and bavaria has a soft spot in my heart (although along with the Netherlands, I lived there for 7 years :)) We'd love to see pictures, esp of the marking! Welcome to the forum, in case I did not say that when you first arrived. Ed |
Klaus,
What order from 1923? Ron |
@edward
thanks for the welcome! where in bavaria did you live? @ron sorry, misstyped i mean the instruction from 1922 regards klaus |
Klaus,
I'm still not sure of which order you are refering to. I have six Reichswehr 1921 unit marked Lugers. Reichswehr unit marked Lugers are kind of scarce. Only approx. 8-10 thousand were procured by the Reichsheer. http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/120_2026.jpg http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/120_2027.jpg Ron |
1 Attachment(s)
the pics now....
beside my bad english, i also make bad pics :cool: the unit stamp |
1 Attachment(s)
ron,
compare your serial numbers with this one: |
1 Attachment(s)
right side of the receiver
|
1 Attachment(s)
the "dove" on the breechblock
|
1 Attachment(s)
s/n on the frame
|
ron,
im reffering to the instruction from 1922. your unit stamps showing all the "/" in their syntax so it is correct. company/regiment.weapon-nr the stamp of my luger shows the unit stamp, how it is made during ww1: regiment.company.weapon-nr and this is, what i do not understand: the old syntax, which is used. regards klaus |
Klaus,
Not all Reichswehr (post WWI) unit marks have the /. Yours is correctly applied and is legitimate. All of my 1921s have 4 digit serial numbers without a letter suffix or with an a or b suffix. Yours is one of the mysterious 5 digit S/Ns with the 8 added. There have been discussions on this in the past. I think the general thought is that the 8 was added after some type of refurbishment or rebuild. Ron |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com