.45 Confusion
 

Okay guys, I'm really confused now (not a unique state for me). Prior to Ralph's recent revelation, how many .45 Lugers have actually been accounted for? Is the one that sold awhile back for close to a million dollars (and was featured in Guns & Ammo magazine and in Tales of the Gun video) the same gun in a museum in Louisiana?

As of the other day, there were two
 

now there are three.


There is some controversy on that, the G&A article stated there is one .45, several board members have seen the one in Louisianna, so that makes trwo, since they are different serial numbers. YThey are # 1 & 2.


Which in some regards doesn't mean much, since Lugers had new numbers all the time. The Dutch insisted on having their guns (mostly) consecutive, while many Lugers for diff countries had numbers that jumped around a bit.


Ed

Re: .45 Confusion
 

Your confusion is understandable. Over the years, many ".45 Luger" stories have been told. It is a long way from being resolved but as I understand it, there are two verifiable .45 caliber Lugers in existence (with Ralph's being a third and exciting addition!). Serial number 2 is in a private collection (the former Sid Aberman Luger as featured in Guns & Ammo), an un-numbered and Crown/N proofed example is in the museum collection in Louisiana. Serial number 1 was presumably destroyed during the US test trials. Rumors of serial number 5 have been around for quite some time, but no tangible evidence has been forthcoming.

Re: .45 Confusion
 

Thanks for the clarifications. Is there any documentation in existance suggesting why the one in Louisiana was unnumbered? Was it supposedly part of the trials?

Re: .45 Confusion
 

No documentation that I am aware of. It could be argued that it is a tool room prototype that may have preceeded the two test examples, but who knows? There is no information as far as I know that would tie it to the US trials.

Re: .45 Confusion
 

Whats the serial number on the carbine?


--Dwight

Re: .45 Confusion
 

It is the opinion of some that the pistol in the Norton Gallery in Shreveport was the prototype of the two trials pistols. It is un-numbered but the magazine is suppose to have a 3 on it, but not on the wood base. The C/N proof would seem to indicate that the pistol was sold at a later date.

According to several collectors, the pistol came out of Canada some 40 years ago, and had tentatively been bought by Carl Wilson for $4000. When Carl and the owner met, the price had gone up to $5000; so Carl Wilson did not buy the pistol. Harry Jones purchased the pistol for $5000 and in less than a month had sold it to Mr. Norton for $10,000. If I remember correctly it was Joe Schroeder that appraised the big Luger for the Norton Gallery, and had permission to photograph the pistol in detail, but didn't. Carl Wilson was the owner of the "Baby" about this same time frame.

Re: .45 Confusion
 

Whats the serial number on the carbine?


--Dwight

The serial number of the carbine
 

hasn;t been revealed yet... I am sure Ralph will reveal it at a time convenient to him... we will all just have to wait.


I think that we (the Lugerforum) can consider ourselves very fortunate that Ralph permitted Ed Tinker to photograph this gun and that the first public photographs of this unique weapon were published here on our site!


regards,


John Sabato

Re: The serial number of the carbine
 

John, I agree completely with your observation. We are all fortunate to have what we have in magnificent weapons and the knowledge to back up our collecting & collections.