Is this a naval issued Luger?
I need your help. I believe I have a naval issued luger, North Atlantic?, but need some assistance as I am a babe in the woods with these things.
This is a 1939/42 dual marked with all matching numbers, including grips, firing pin, etc. This has one matching mag which is also marked to match the navy "rack number" I assume which is stamped into the backstrap. It also has the holster which is supposed to be delivered tomorow. This is non import marked but also does not have any capture papers. Oh, and the barrel is perfect, like it has never even been fired. If anyone has additional info please feel free to share, and I greatly appreciate the help http://i.imgur.com/Xbw4eIZ.jpg http://i.imgur.com/LTAYomx.jpg http://i.imgur.com/iHJOWRX.jpg http://i.imgur.com/ZhzkZXw.jpg http://i.imgur.com/LmLUrfz.jpg http://i.imgur.com/6pnZ1KA.jpg http://i.imgur.com/5UxyBsk.jpg http://i.imgur.com/sSvdctV.jpg http://i.imgur.com/2OLC5hM.jpg http://i.imgur.com/hi5X2Mv.jpg http://i.imgur.com/uuwRWRZ.jpg http://i.imgur.com/EtAbj8O.jpg http://i.imgur.com/t4XKsa7.jpg http://i.imgur.com/crdXj4M.jpg http://i.imgur.com/5WUkxrO.jpg http://i.imgur.com/KX4tUz1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/N6ekLFu.jpg http://i.imgur.com/yRDi3re.jpg |
Hi Robert, You are correct, you have a Nazi Navy Luger which was issued to the High Seas Fleet based at Wilhelmshaven. That double matched mag is a big plus. Congratulations on a great acquisition.
Regards, Norm |
|
The question of it being a faked piece was raised by someone, do you think that is possible with this one? Any other information that may be pertinent?
I will post pictures of the holster once it is in my possession |
Hi Robert, I don't see any evidence of foul play, it looks legit to me.
Regards, Norm |
I'm guessing that it would take a hands-on inspection to be reasonably sure, but even then can an expert be absolutely 100% certain?
It's an interesting dilemma we create once we get so heavily invested in a couple of crudely stamped markings. But, for whatever it is worth, to me it looks good. Actually it looks like a heck of a score...Congratulations. dju |
Thanks guys, I appreciate it. I know nothing of values on these things or history. I tried searching online but there really isn't a lot to go off of. I have a byf '41 I picked up a few years ago and a commercial .30 but that is the extent of my Luger knowledge.
I appreciate the feedback |
Looks good to me.....1939 Navy Lugers are very uncommon!!..are you in Canada?...our troops brought back quite a few Navy marked WW2 Lugers!!!
|
LC, no sir I am in Missouri. This came from the man who grabbed it in December 1944.
Thank you for the reply |
Quote:
A member here collects 'bringback' stories; this sounds like it could be a good one! :D |
Not much of a story, the guy said stuff was everywhere for the picking basically. No heroic tale (although I think all of those at Normandy were heroic), he just basically "picked them up"
|
Navy.?
I confess...I am a total novice when it comes to Lugers......so what made you know it was a Navy Issued.?....I would just like to know in case of 1 in a million I happen on one some day....to me it would be just a "regular army luger"...I would like to know the markings are or what to look for that would tell me it was Navy issued.......which of course would make it even better.....anyway.....just asking....Hans Fischer
|
I didn't have an idea it was a navy until I got it home and started searching the internet. While I didn't find another 39/42 I did find other pistols with that same marking on it, the N and property number and they said it was a navy issue. Once I seen that I asked on the forums and it was confirmed that is what those markings stood for. When I bought it I thought it was a nice Luger, no thougts of anything else.
|
Norman
I'm not an expert on Navy Lugers BUT to me it looks like a genuine Kriegsmarine Variation, made by MAUSER between April 1939 and 1942, rear frame hump, with its N property number on the back strap, and what convinced me was the serial number included between 200r / 8250z. Congratulations for the acquisition I would say! Sergio |
looks as tho the mauser sn's on the mags do not match but the navy unit marks do matched.
|
Hi Ben, Take a closer look. The first mag pictured is non-matching, but the second is a true double match, both it's serial number and it's Naval property number match those of the gun.
Regards, Norm |
Yes one mag matches, the spare one I believe and the other serial does not and the property mark is a few off.
What do you guys think this thing is worth? |
I have seen the term "rear hump". Can you expand on exactly what you are referring to please?
Quote:
|
Look at the gun from the side, noting that right angle of the frame on the rear. Notice that the rear isn't a perfectly straight edge from bottom to top, but slightly bulges back toward the top edge. That "hump" is designed so that the main rear toggle pin can not work its way out during operation. And it was a feature distinctive to Mauser mfg. Lugers in the very late 30's. And it helps us ID a late 30's Mauser frame.
Hope this helps. dju |
Thank you very much David
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com