LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   Krieghoff Lugers (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=124)
-   -   Stirring.. (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=24019)

FNorm 05-02-2010 08:28 PM

Stirring..
 
7 Attachment(s)
Well, the site has been kindda slow. Let's see if I can stir things up. One of my newest:

wlyon 05-02-2010 08:31 PM

Very,very nice. Thanks for sharing. Bill

Norme 05-02-2010 08:32 PM

Gee Fred, You certainly stirred things up - feelings of envy! Regards, Norm

Edward Tinker 05-02-2010 08:56 PM

Well, the left mag looks okay from the base, the right one is forced appearing...


not sure if I like the mag loader, but I have been fooled by krieg tools before.



ed

saab-bob 05-02-2010 11:00 PM

Fred
Wonderful gun!
Just a quick question. On your matching mags,how did Krieghoff indicate the spare magazine?
As I do not see a + or a numeral on the base of either one or did they just not do that?
I have never seen a Krieg with 2 matching mags!
Cool
Bob

FNorm 05-03-2010 09:34 AM

Bob,

Gibson, pg 56: " In closing, it should be pointed out that very few Krieghoff magazines have been observed with an indication of first or second magazine."

Same with numbers on the hold open. Gibson, pg 105: " ...If numbered latches do indeed exist they are very rare." The one on this pistol is proofed but unnumbered.

Ed; Must be the light. Close examination of the mag bottoms under 8x shows the numbers, font, size, placement and depth to be identical. No apparent scrubbing of the bottom face.

FN

wlyon 05-03-2010 11:25 AM

I have a 1937 Krieg with a numbered hold open latch. So they do exist but apparently rarely. Bill

FNorm 05-03-2010 02:55 PM

Bill,

My 1937 is numbered too. Maybe they stopped doing that when war started? Anybody with a 1938-1939HK and numbered HO?

FN

Norme 05-03-2010 03:02 PM

Hi Fred, I very much doubt that you'll be hearing from anyone with a 1939 Krieghoff. Regards, Norm

FNorm 05-03-2010 03:57 PM

LOL... You're right. Norme. I wasn't thinking. I've been kindda immersed in Mausers lately


FN

Dave L. 05-12-2010 11:47 PM

The loading tool is in fact an original HK and the acceptance mark is an orginal late date mark. This is interesting in that the dated chamber gives an indication when the late acceprance mark was stamped and issued. Thank you for sharing the information and photos. I really would like to add an original HK LE/2 late date marked tool to my schraubenzieher collection. There is still hope that they are out there. Dave L.

lugerholsterrepair 05-13-2010 11:10 AM

Fred, I wonder if you would be kind enough to send me a good photo, or two-closeup of your Krieghoff tool for my archives?

Stunning rig! Very nice...Makes my 1937 look like junk.

Jerry Burney

FNorm 05-13-2010 05:23 PM

Jerry,

I'll try. but something has changed. A button got moved? Right now I can't get any extreme close-ups for some reason.. I'll have to fuss around with it.

Nice yes, but your 1937 is still the miracle gun.

Fred


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com