More weird "Navy" stuff
With your indulgence, I'll consider myself a Sophomore at Luger University, albeit, perhaps, first semester. I've tried very hard to pay attention in class, do as much homework and lab work as I could, etc. Perhaps I was out sick for the lecture...but do any other students recall if the "DWM-NAVY-POST-WAR-LUGER-CARBINE-WITH-STOCK" was ever covered in class? I seem to be missing my notes.
Well, danged if there aren't a couple of fine examples up for auction. https://www.proxibid.com/Firearms-Mi...ation/60283190 and https://www.proxibid.com/Firearms-Mi...ation/60283191 The online catalog pics aren't clear enough to detect any C/Ms--or much of anything else, for that matter. These contraptions would require SBR status, right? I like the top one better, as it offers better outcomes if reconfigured, I think. |
These contraptions would require SBR status, right? I would think it's a good question to ask, yes.
The first one at least seems to have a carbine sight forward of the chamber. One could easily replace the Navy sight with an Artillery toggle with no sight and end up with what could be considered a legitimate carbine? I am not at all familiar with what the ATF considers a "Luger carbine" |
Two rear sights?
Reminded me of the TV show "Fantasy Island". G2 |
Quote:
|
How would that work? Can't see that as practical, one would obscure the other.
G2 |
Quote:
Ron |
The first one would likely pass "1902" muster if the redundant navy sight were removed; as it is it is just "silly". ;)JMHO
The second would fall into the huge catch-all of "1920" luger carbine, again JMHO. |
Some "20 carbines" have navy sights. Some others have artillery sights.
--Dwight |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com