LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   Repairs, Restoration & Refinishing (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=127)
-   -   Clark/Thor Heavy Barrel Target Luger (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=6029)

Thor 01-09-2003 02:14 PM

Clark/Thor Heavy Barrel Target Luger
 
Hugh just sent me a 4" bull barrel target Luger to rust blue. This little sweety will be test fired for accuracy and I believe he intends to sell it. Base shooter is a mismatched 1939 S/42 Mauser. Barrel has NO TAPER and has a diameter of around 8/10". This should be a real shooter, the barrel is stock new. I think he has some other target ammenities to add, he talked about a trigger stop to reduce travel. Kinda reminds me when Ruger took their standard twenty two and put a heavy barrel on it. Standing in the offhand position, the gun really holds steady! Keep an eye out for this one in a few weeks.

Hugh 01-10-2003 12:14 AM

We also have a 6" bull bbl in the works. This gun feels heavy when you pick it up, but holds very steady when you aim it, no "light muzzle wobble" here! Plan on putting both guns on Gunbroker after Ted's refinish, a trigger tuneup, and sight in.

AGE 01-11-2003 12:03 AM

Hugh,

What kind of sights are on these Lugers? Have you done any trigger work?

Hugh 01-11-2003 01:58 AM

Al,

Front sight will be a Marbles or Lyman gold or ivory bead, rear sight notch filed into a "U" shape. I am smoothing and tightening the trigger pull to remove much of the slack and give a smooth let off.

Hugh

AGE 01-11-2003 12:50 PM

Hugh,

Sign me up if you can recess a good modern adjustable sight into the toggle. I don't care for the long overhang on the S&W sight on your Armadillo gun.

Since our last communication, I've been examining adjustable rear sights with the dream of adapting them to the Luger toggle without a lot of overhang to the rear. The Luger toggle link is only about 1" long by 0.5" wide. The movable part of a Bomar sight is about 1.3" long and might work well (with a small overhang) but it is 0.45" wide, probably too wide to be recessed into the toggle. The S&W sight is only 0.25" wide but 2.7" long. It might work OK if the flexible part were high strength spring steel which could be shortened to 1" or so, but I don't think it is.

Brownells doesn't have anything that looks promising. Colt put a very compact adjustable sight on their pre-war national match .45s. It would be great if you could get one of these (probably way too much expense).

Oh well, just dreaming--that's a lot easier than producing hardware as you and Ted do. Keep up the good work.

Hugh 01-11-2003 08:04 PM

Al,

I have several different adjustable sights (Bomar, Micro, Meg Gar, S&W & MMC). So far the old style MMC for the 1911 looks the most promising. I have managed to accumulate a half dozen or so of these. I have dovetailed one of these into a rear toggle and it seems to be working ok.
<img border="0" alt="[king]" title="" src="graemlins/r.gif" />
I haven't decided whether to try to add this option to these two guns or not.

AGE 01-11-2003 11:42 PM

Hugh,

How about E-mailing me or posting a picture of the MMC on a Luger toggle (if it's not too much trouble)?

HÃ?Â¥kan Spuhr 01-20-2003 04:58 PM

I have installed a number of Bomarsigths on the lugertoggles and that works great.
But there is a overhang, but I do really belive that no other adjusatble sight can take the pounding and the stress from the lugertoggle.
IT's much more severe than the stress from a 1911 slide.

http://www.vapensmedjan.com/customluger_4.htm

Regards HÃ?Â¥kan

AGE 01-20-2003 11:38 PM

Sorry Hakan, that's not what I am looking for. Thanks for posting your Bomar/Luger pictures anyway.

AGE 01-22-2003 12:22 AM

Rick,

Can you post some pictures. I like the idea of a shortened S&W sight recessed into the toggle. Perhaps it could be adjusted for elevation by mounting a screw below it at the back end with a relatively large head. This would be accessed through a smaller hole. It could be attached at the front end by a screw similar to the original attachment screw. Then to change elevation, one would loosen the front screw, turn the screw under the sight by reaching through the hole, then tighten the front sight which would also serve as a lock screw.

AGE 01-22-2003 03:11 PM

Rick,

Sounds like your interests and mine are similar. I would like to see a scan of your whole gun with this sight. Yes, a grooved toggle seems desirable to me. I suppose a set of shims to mount under the sight might be another (crude) way to get an elevation adjustment.

I love the installation on my 1911 by Bob Day about 20 years ago. The end product is no more bulky than the stock sight, but obviously more fragile than the stock sight. I can live with that since I don't plan to drop it, but I'll fix it if I do.

John Sabato 01-22-2003 04:59 PM

Rick... very interesting... please post a photo of your rear sight installation for the engineer in all of us...

thanks...

HÃ?Â¥kan Spuhr 01-22-2003 06:45 PM

MAny problems with adjustable sights on toggles comes up after some thousands rounds.
SIghts get sloppy and with a big play and suddenly they just crack.

I have had a bomar destroyed to but not as fast as some other sights. And i have installed a number of Bomars.

The smartest thing would probably be to have the elevation in the front sight and the windage in the rearsight and that way both make a pretty rear sight and much more sturdy sight.

Regards HÃ?Â¥kan

AGE 01-23-2003 12:03 AM

Guys,

I finally got around to examing the reat sight on my Ruger .44. It is only about an inch long and the forward part is 5/16" wide. It looks possible to recess this into a Luger toggle. What do you think?

HÃ?Â¥kan Spuhr 01-23-2003 12:50 AM

We once tried the well made sigth from Bowen.
Those are made to fit direktly into a rugerrevolver and they are wery well made.

But it didnt take many rounds to ruin the sight so i think its better to not try.
It's also difficult to install one without an overhang.

Regards HÃ?Â¥kan

Dwight Gruber 01-23-2003 01:15 AM

HÃ?Â¥kan,

If you can tell us, what are the dynamics involved in these failures?

--Dwight

HÃ?Â¥kan Spuhr 01-24-2003 06:07 PM

On a 1911 slide the sights just goes back and forward again, in a .44 magnum revolver there is almost no tough forces as all as everything happends so slowly.

But a luger pistol is problably the 9mm pistol that have the fastest cycle time of all semiautos because the parts are so low weight and the recoilspring is so heavy.
When installing a adj. sight on the toggle it tipps back and forward extremely fast and this movement is extremely difficult for a sigth.

Regards HÃ?Â¥kan

AGE 01-25-2003 12:18 AM

Hakan,

You may well be right. Still, it should be possible to design a sight that would work. I am a mechanical engineer and I can imagine what some of your results were. Can you post any details or pictures?

Nevertheless, it should be possible to make a GOOD copy of a Ruger sight from titanium or Inconel that would hold up (of course I probably wouldn't want to pay for it). If they just broke, the metal is probably some junk casting.

AGE 01-25-2003 03:31 PM

I forgot to add something about the attaching method. I suspect the attaching screw may be a problem, if not that, then any threaded hole in the toggle might strip. Also, pins used in elevation systems could be weak points.

Thor 01-25-2003 03:42 PM

It is shame that a front adjustable sight wouldnt work, all Luger barrels have dove tails and most sights work with those.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com