LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   New Collectors Forum (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=133)
-   -   Help with value. (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=37930)

lemmonhead 11-19-2017 05:22 PM

Help with value.
 
9 Attachment(s)
I have an older friend that recently had a stroke. He has several Luger pistols that he asked me to help him sell. I have no idea the value or the exact model. Any help on value and identification would be appreciated.

1. Made by Mauser, 1939, blued. All matching numbers. Very clean looking pistol.

2 DWM, Artillery?, 1917, Finish is worn. Left side of pistol has pitting. The picture really brings it out, in person it does not look as bad.

gunbugs 11-19-2017 05:38 PM

The clean one is a 1939 Mauser Banner police gun. Nice. I would expect around 1700 to 2000, depending on who's selling and who is buying.
The Artillery is rough, but still might bring 800 or so. Maybe more.
I'm sure we will get more opinions here.
(They are gonna want more closeup photos.)

Edward Tinker 11-19-2017 05:47 PM

I would essentially agree - probably a bit more for the Banner and a bit less for the artillery, since it will require a new take down lever.

Ed

lemmonhead 11-19-2017 06:07 PM

Thanks for the quick responses. What determines the 1939 to be a banner police model?

tomaustin 11-19-2017 06:14 PM

not intending to be a smart...."because Ed wrote the book.."note his authorship in his header...he has infinite details on this subject....Tom:)

gunbugs 11-19-2017 06:28 PM

To give a straightforward answer, The Mauser banner on the toggle in conjunction with the 1939 date, plus the sear safety, (the little flat spring over the top of the sideplate), plus the "Eagle L" proof on the right of the receiver. All that together makes it a police issue gun. I would note that the magazine appears incorrect for that particular gun, at first glance.

lemmonhead 11-19-2017 06:34 PM

Certainly not questioning anyone’s knowledge or opinion. We were looking in a gun value book, my friend had, and it listed a number of possibilities that this pistol could have fallen under, as made by Mauser. I am just trying to educate my self on how it is dertetmined to be a banner police, ie finish, markings, date.

lemmonhead 11-19-2017 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gunbugs (Post 310637)
To give a straightforward answer, The Mauser banner on the toggle in conjunction with the 1939 date, plus the sear safety, (the little flat spring over the top of the sideplate), plus the "Eagle L" proof on the right of the receiver. All that together makes it a police issue gun. I would note that the magazine appears incorrect for that particular gun, at first glance.

Thanks again. What would the correct magazine look like? I think he has a couple other Lugers so it may have been swapped out or he may have extras. I will look when I see him again.
Are the the magazines numbered to the pistol?

Bill_in_VA 11-19-2017 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemmonhead (Post 310638)
Certainly not questioning anyone’s knowledge or opinion. We were looking in a gun value book, my friend had, and it listed a number of possibilities that this pistol could have fallen under, as made by Mauser. I am just trying to educate my self on how it is dertetmined to be a banner police, ie finish, markings, date.

It has the Mauser banner on the toggle, hence the name. The eagle/L is a polce-only acceptance marking; likewise the sear safety is a police-only modification/addition. And of course, as tomaustin noted, Ed Tinker - one of the respondents to your question - is an expert on police Lugers and an author of a book dealing specifically with police Lugers. ;) The gun has been identified correctly.

DavidJayUden 11-19-2017 07:01 PM

The magazine should have an unpainted aluminum bottom. I believe that it should also have the gun's full serial number and suffix letter clearly stamped on the bottom.
dju

lemmonhead 11-19-2017 08:47 PM

4 Attachment(s)
A few more pictured of the Mauser Police that I had on my phone.

DavidJayUden 11-19-2017 08:57 PM

An unusually nice example that should sell quickly if priced right.
dju

tharpo 11-19-2017 09:44 PM

1 Attachment(s)
If you can find a matching magazine it would increase the value of the 1939. The magazine would have an aluminum bottom with the gun's serial number and the letter "w" underneath. See photo.

Edward Tinker 11-19-2017 10:05 PM

this is what my notes show
Quote:

Banner police will have either no acceptance markings (blank base), or will have army acceptance markings marked FXO, P.08 and se/37 accepted on one side. They are blued, mandrel-formed with the concave base, with a center pin and Haenel on the side.

Ben M. 11-20-2017 11:23 AM

broken part on artillery luger will hurt value. matching part is damaged and usually has to be tossed in trash if cannot weld or fix.

lemmonhead 11-21-2017 11:22 PM

7 Attachment(s)
He did not have the original magazine for the 1939 Banner Police. He seemed a little disappointed when I let home know the estimates that were mentioned in the thread. I think he bought these pistols 30-40 years ago hoping that they would be worth more. He is not really a collector just bought them as an investment.

He had one more that he let me see. No date. Looks like it has a grip safety.

DavidJayUden 11-21-2017 11:45 PM

Nice! That one is a 1900 American Eagle Luger in .30 cal. It was mfg. for sale in the USA and appears original. Better do your research on value, like at Simpson, Ltd. website, but I'd guess it should be somewhere around $2k.
Too bad the owner is disappointed in value estimates he is hearing. Welcome to my world. The only things that appreciate madly are things that I do not own...
dju

gunbugs 11-22-2017 01:12 AM

Rarity, desirability, and condition, if you have all three, then you have an investment. If you only have two, then you have a hobby.

Bill_in_VA 11-22-2017 07:24 AM

3 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by lemmonhead (Post 310681)
... He seemed a little disappointed when I let home know the estimates that were mentioned in the thread. I think he bought these pistols 30-40 years ago hoping that they would be worth more. He is not really a collector just bought them as an investment. ...

Granted, he may not have enough of an investment return on a couple of Luger to retire on, but he should be happy with current values. I’ll take the contrary position and say that if he bought them 30 to 40 years ago he did quite well on his Luger investment. Even if he spent $200 for a Luger in 1975, his asset’s value has increased tenfold. Almost nothing in the stock market has risen that much.

hayhugh 11-22-2017 02:14 PM

Not one mention of matching numbers "back in the day"

4 Scale 11-24-2017 09:53 PM

A Luger that cost $200 in 1975 and is worth say $1,800 today has appreciated at an annual rate of about 5-6%. Inflation has averaged about 3.8% per year during that time.

Over time stocks tend to be much better investments but are relatively more volatile, as anyone who was long in the market in 1928 or 2008 can attest.

Bill if you can tell me the date of that ad for the $49.85 Luger, I'll take a guess at value today and compute an appreciation rate.

I've played with Luger appreciation rates a few different ways, and my best guess is that over time they appreciate at a couple percent above inflation. That means IMO they are in fact a type of investment, albeit one that seems to appreciate less than some other asset types.

Pistol 12-04-2017 03:45 PM

I can't see the serial number on the underside of the barrel. It could be the lighting, or would no serial # on barrell be normal for Banners? Does lack of barrel serial # indicate the barrel is a replacement ?

Bill_in_VA 12-04-2017 05:35 PM

Don’t hold me to it, Greg, but I think that particular ad dates to 1959.

4 Scale 12-05-2017 01:05 PM

Thanks Bill. This calculator

https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm

estimates that $49.85 in 1959 equates to $424 today. Expressed as a yearly inflation rate that is roughly 3.8% a year.

Assuming the pistols sold in that ad were military P08s in average condition and original finish, applying various annual average appreciation rates to that $49.85 original cost:

5% per year =$ 845
6% per year =$1,460

The way you read this is "if the pistol went up an average of 5% per year from 1959 to 2017, it is worth $845 today".

So, from 1959 to now, based on the assumptions stated, my guess is that this hypothetical "average" pistol would today be worth at least $1,000, i.e. it increased in value roughly 5%-6% per year. Phrased differently this would seem to support the idea that Lugers appreciate at a couple percent a year above inflation.

Thanks for posting that ad, the only way to figure out appreciation rates is to know what they sold for at earlier dates.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com