![]() |
Cartridges are too short
Ok I have read a bunch , and the length of a 9mm makes
a difference on weather a Luger will function properly. If you take a 9mm Luger and change the barrel to .30 the only change you might need to make is to change the spring. If what everybody is saying is true the really shorter .30 bullets should never work in a pistol that was 9mm. Right? Same magazine, same everything but the barrel. I know I'm like a 2 year old and ask too many questions. Paul |
The SAMMI max OAL for a 30 Luger RNFMJ is 1.175 in.
The SAMMI max OAL for 9mm 115/124 RNFMJ is 1.169 in. |
2 Attachment(s)
The little ones are quite long ;)
|
I believe your premise is flawed; you over simplify what works and why.
Have you tried "standing" several 9mm and several(brands) of 7.65mm side by side- or measuring the OAL? I've gone so far as to sort WWB rounds by length, to see if a particular luger liked "long or short" better. Yes, the rounds vary, QC just isn't what it could be. You will find that the OAL varies significantly from brand to brand and lot to lot. Some pistols are not very sensitive to OAL, others are- not much rhyme or reason to it. Did you buy the Goertz and Sturgess CD? There is a whole chapter on ammo, another on magazine differences and changes(improvements". A "generalization" , which often can get one in trouble, regarding 7.65mm/.30 luger is that pistols in that caliber are somewhat or even noticeably more sensitive to ammo. Whether it is velocity, weight, or OAL. JMHO. |
Ok after standing a 9mm and a .30 next to each other , they are almost
the same legth. Guess its a optical illusion that one is a lot shorter than the other. Humm missed that one pretty good, sorry Paul |
No need to be sorry!
Absorb, learn get smarter ;) |
Quote:
|
The Luger was initially designed to chamber the .30 Luger / 7.65mm Luger round.
Later, the Navy, wanting a more powerful "military" class round, requested the 9mm. Modifications were made, but mainly to the barrel and recoil spring. Remember, for many things Luger the FAQ document is your friend! Marc |
Quote:
DWM existed a long time before SAMMI stuck its finger in the potl. Proper OAL of an original DWM factory 7.65 mm, round nose cartridge, at was 1.173 inches. All of the current 7.65 Parabellum rounds I have measured are much, much shorter than what is required for 100% reliable function. Sieger |
Quote:
The proof is in the pudding; as smart is what smart does! Sieger |
There is another pertinent difference between the 7,65 Parabellum cartridge and the DWM 9x19 round (actually, a couple of pertinent differences).
With the too-short 9mm round, the bullets snag on the top edge of the chamber. The 7,65 bullet, being narrower, does not present its ogive to the top of the chamber, so does not get caught up even if the OAL is a fraction shorter. The original 9x19mm design used a truncated-cone bullet. Although not specifically designed this way for proper feeding, it coincidentally successfully mimics the ogive properties of the 7,65mm round. Some modern Winchester 9mm ball ammunition has a gently truncated-cone bullet. --Dwight |
Quote:
As long as I follow the correct procedure in properly determining OAL, I've never experienced jamming with any TC or RN bullet of proper weight and configuration (most typically available brands). The correct OAL for the RN 9mm bullet is also 1.173 inches, NOT the later derived SAMMI, so often misquoted, 1.169 inches. For a review, our readers might enjoy reading, in the Reloading Sticky Section, "How to Determine Proper OAL with a New Bullet" as it will answer many of their questions. Sieger |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
OP should change his title to "cartridges" not "bullets"; I believe that the OAL length of the cartridge is the subject of this thread.
To do so, select edit, then "go advanced"; then you can edit the title. |
2 Attachment(s)
|
This is interesting. If a lowball bid will yield some .30 ammo that is other than the readily available standard fare, I will add it to my little collection. I measured some, and here are the results:
Winchester White Box......................1.150 x Winchester Red and Yellow Box.......1.150 x Remington Green and Yellow Box.....1.131 x Remington Dark Green Box..............1.134 Fiocchi Gray Box Brown Printing.......1.127 x Fiocchi Purple Box............................1.119 x According to the discussion, I'm amazed that any of this stuff works at all, but my shooter works without complaints. |
Man this is a hard room to play. Have to be perfect on your posts. Folks remember if I knew all of this , I wouldn't be posting questions! But thanks to those who help instead of make you look stupid.
|
The more posts a thread gets, the more likely it is to run off the rails and end up in the weeds.
We all come away feeling whooped every now and then, but we keep coming back to collectively learn more. Part of the fun, I guess. dju |
Quote:
|
Quote:
bullets are the little things that go out the barrel- Cartridges are where the OAL matters. Though some "bullets" may be or are too short to reload in the .30 luger. Lighten up- bullets matter to reloaders- cartridges to a way bigger audience- which is why I suggested the change. Not to make you look stupid.:cheers: |
Dont even get a Limey started on this!
He would call the cartridge for a bullet and a bullet for a bullet head. If you involve journalists all standards are off. https://i0.wp.com/www.bookwormroom.c...uns.jpeg?w=900 And then there is the good old: http://www.gunsandammo.com/files/201...-Gun-Terms.jpg |
1 Attachment(s)
I have been waiting a long time to use this picture :D
|
Quote:
Can you shoot a full magazine of 8, with no jamming, with all of these? Though I'm not doubting your honesty, I would seriously doubt a Luger would pull this off. Sieger |
Quote:
I did have some trouble with some boxes of Fiocchi SJSP rounds which seemed to be gritty on the business ends, with a thin film of corrosion. They would bind in the mag, until I shined up the ends again. I'm glad that is gone. Maybe my love for the gun inspires selective validation! So, I will do a test and pay attention. I usually don't shoot the old, odd stuff, but use Fiocchi at home, where I can save the boxer primed brass. I will shoot two MecGar mags of each over the next few days and report back with results. Here are two more OAL: Swedish surplus........1.167 Norma.....................1.151 |
I have a 1906 .30 Luger pistol that is finicky re: ammo, it won't reliably chamber. 30 Luger Fiocchi but does reliably chamber Prvi. In comparing OAL, Prvi is longer than Fiocchi. As I can find no other physical difference between the rounds I have concluded that Fiocchi OAL is too short for that particular Luger.
Fiocchi chambers just fine in my three other Lugers chambered for .30 Luger. So, I conclude most Lugers chambered in .30 Luger can tolerate shorter ammo (as Dwight explains in post #11) but if a FTF (nose-high jam) is encountered, it is worth testing longer ammo in that pistol. |
Quote:
Taking a good look at that very angled grip, I think you will find that the cartridges loaded toward the bottom of the eight shot magazine cause the upper most cartridges to cant downwardly. This downward canting is the source of the infamous "Luger Jam". This is why proper OAL is so critical with this design. This is true for both the 9mm and the 7.65mm. Sieger |
There was a guy on youtube that was having the same problem with a 45 magazine.
He noticed when he loaded several rounds in, that the top round would wiggle up and down at the front. He solved it with a stronger spring in the magazine. maybe that is the answer to Luger problems. |
I have found the Hornady 124gr. 9mm mimics the truncated nose of the original round. I'm away from my reloading room, but, I think the Hornady bullet is lettered HTX or ?, it is a hollow point.
|
Quote:
Wolf offers "extra 10% power" round springs and new zig-zag springs for the later mags. GT also has springs, and when he works on/ re-works a mag it most of the time gets a new spring. A really weak spring won't raise a cartridge fast enough to chamber, nor will it operate the hold open. |
1 Attachment(s)
Do gun ranges make more money selling ammo or collecting brass?
|
Eric,
A retail markup for ammo might be around 25% Scrap brass can be sold for around $1.50 per pound. I think the answer would generally be the ammo sales. |
My guess would be that salvage brass sales would be behind ammo sales, target sales, range time and firearm rental/sales. However the price of pick-up brass goes up sharply once sorted by caliber.
dju |
1 Attachment(s)
|
My indoor range doesn't want you to pickup your brass. I have a friend that machines
brass quite a bit. Probably 30% of his business is turning brass rings for pressure washers. He has an immense brass left over amount. The price jumps up and down just like gold. |
Quote:
|
What happens to all the toxic lead?
|
RE: toxic lead, At trap and skeet ranges we have lead re-claimers who strip the soil, sift it, and sell the used shot back (to me) for about 3/4-4/5 the price of new. I've shot reclaimed shot for years and years.
I suspect that the indoor ranges have a similar program. dju |
Lead- we have thoroughly hijacked Paul's original thread.
Just remember, lead is only "toxic" if you eat it, drink it, breathe the fumes if it is molten- or if you get shot with a lead "bullet". ;) Better not to get me started on those "toxic" chemicals, like table salt, water, oxygen, and on and on; least of all those "extremely toxic" chemicals we choose to call "medicines"! |
Don I think we got about all we could out of Cartridges, so might as well change a
little. By the way I went into Walmart and asked the guy where the Cartridges were. He said ...over by the printers. Then I asked where the bullets were and he said they are in Sporting Goods. :) |
Quote:
Well you are in Texas, after all.....:evilgrin: |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com