LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   All P-08 Military Lugers (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=122)
-   -   Reichswehr 1920 property stamped Polizei Luger Opinions (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=31550)

Maestro 11-08-2013 09:55 PM

Reichswehr 1920 property stamped Polizei Luger Opinions
 
9 Attachment(s)
hello, would appreciate opinions on this Reichswehr 1920 property stamped Police Luger . :rolleyes:

Maestro 11-08-2013 09:57 PM

what value would you place on this Luger?

Edward Tinker 11-08-2013 10:04 PM

1917 Erfurt with a gov't 1920 marking - went into police service and received a mag and sear safety - has been refinished at some point, would assume arsenal / so that would be expected...

I am assuming it has a matching magazine, and it looks like its in excellent condition. The magazine is aluminum, so is 1930's era likely. I would venture a $1400-1700 value

More information, rather than just pictures would help

all matching?

holster or anything else?

any unit markings?

Maestro 11-08-2013 10:08 PM

i thought the mag was matching?!!?

Edward Tinker 11-08-2013 10:12 PM

I changed what I wrote, as I assumed... but you don't show any pictures of the serial number, so its a guess that the '24' matches????

DavidJayUden 11-08-2013 10:35 PM

The mag. may match from its rebirth as a police gun. It is not a matching mag from its original military conception.
A nice gun. Congratulations!
dju

Maestro 11-09-2013 12:54 AM

What I know about it retains 98% of its original anodized finish throughout and it shows only very modest handling wear. The pistol also features all matching serial numbers.

The pistol was arsenal re-finished/re-worked in 1920 where the barrel was shortened to its current length. The gun was originally unit-marked on the inside grip area, but these markings were X-ed out during the arsenal refurbishment and are now illegible.

This weapon has a sear safety. I assume that the original mag was damaged and/or lost to time and that a replacement mag was inserted and serial-numbered at the time of the arsenal refurbishment to match the gun.

Unfortunately no other accessories, holster, extra magazine. Just the pistol. Hope that helps :cheers:

klaus 3338 11-09-2013 02:01 AM

It´s a "parts- gun": Receiver is DWM, toggle Erfurt.
Regards Klaus

Edward Tinker 11-09-2013 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maestro (Post 243711)
..

The pistol was arsenal re-finished/re-worked in 1920 where the barrel was shortened to its current length. The gun was originally unit-marked on the inside grip area, but these markings were X-ed out during the arsenal refurbishment and are now illegible.
...

NO, NO, NO
Old information and not correct

1920 is not the arsenal remarking - see the FAQ to read about the 1920 gov't marking

It would have been re marked whenever the unit changed or the gun went to a new police unit, could have been 1928 (or other date, sure not 1920).

Was the barrel shortened? if frame was DWM, then yes

Maestro 11-09-2013 10:34 AM

Ahh, thanks. Yes the barrel was shortened.

Geo99 11-09-2013 02:22 PM

Klaus is correct.

This is not an Erfurt pistol. It is not what we call a matching numbers gun. It is a mismatched re-blued almost complete DWM - with a partial Erfurt toggle. The fact that the toggle train has the same numbers on it as the rest of the gun means nothing.
The frame, barrel/barrel extension, and all small parts are DWM. This gun has been reblued again more recently (after the Police refurb/reissue). Is there a SN stamped behind the rear sight? (there should be but I don't see one).

The matching mag is a nice touch but adds little value to the gun because:
1. the gun is not a complete original.
2. mag has been ground down and renumbered, but probably not by the police.
3. police issue mag should have a 1, 2, or 3 stamped on bottom.

$1100-$1200 is top value, as a nice mostly matching DWM shooter.

Sorry Maestro, it's probably not what you wanted to hear.

- Geo

Edward Tinker 11-09-2013 03:08 PM

Geo, I would want to see more before I would declare it reblued after the police.

The sear safety pin is in the white. I would want to see under it to see if it is in the white on the underside?

Not all police guns receive a 1, 2 or 3 - I agree I expect to see it. Do you see obvious regrinding on the base? I did not, but I am on my laptop. It does look odd, I would want to see pictures from the sides to see if reground and a real close up of the numbers.

Maestro 11-09-2013 05:45 PM

Geo not a problem, as I'm looking for advise from advanced collectors; I will try to get more pictures from the seller regards to your questions. I'm also learning quiet a bit from Edward Tinker and will see if i can get from seller a better picture of the underneath of the safety pin.

Maestro 11-09-2013 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward Tinker (Post 243766)
The sear safety pin is in the white. I would want to see under it to see if it is in the white on the underside?

yes, it is :thumbup: it retains it's whitish color :rockon:

Maestro 11-09-2013 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geo99 (Post 243761)
Is there a SN stamped behind the rear sight? (there should be but I don't see one).

yes, it's "24" :cheers:

Maestro 11-09-2013 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geo99 (Post 243761)
The fact that the toggle train has the same numbers on it as the rest of the gun means nothing.

point well taken; the seller is going to carefully open up the inside & check the serial numbers. I asked him to send me pictures so i can post. thanks Geo. :thumbup:

Maestro 11-09-2013 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward Tinker (Post 243721)
1920 is not the arsenal remarking - see the FAQ to read about the 1920 gov't marking

FAQ is a very valuable section, thanks Ed for reminding me of its presence. Here's the section on the so called "double date"

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward Tinker (Post 243721)
FAQ#40 What is a double date?
Here is another area that is brought up, especially in the GunShow circuit. Double dates. True double datres are fairly rare, and what most folks call a double date is really a Reichswehr 1920 property stamping. I quote Jan Still: The 1920 stamp was added sometime between August 1920 and April 1921. It is a Reichswehr property stamp applied to identify the Luger as German Army property to prevent theft. Civilians were paid a bounty for turning in their unauthorized weapons to be destroyed. The Army feared the theft of its unmarked Lugers for the bounty.(Weimar Lugers page 20-23)


wlyon 11-09-2013 08:18 PM

Unless you are looking for a shooter, and the price is right, I would avoid this made up luger. Bill

Tony Min 11-09-2013 11:56 PM

It looks like a recent refinish to me. Blue in the pitting. Some of the edges ground round. I wouldn't pay more than $1000
But I am partial to guns with wear. Some people like the refinished look.

klaus 3338 11-10-2013 01:48 AM

When I looked at the photos I mentioned that the barrel has the TP (Technische Polizei) stamp and the acceptance mark of those years. It also has another "blue" than the rest of the Luger. I do not think that the pistol was reblued ever.

Maestro 11-10-2013 12:47 PM

6 Attachment(s)
numbers matching

Maestro 11-10-2013 09:47 PM

7 Attachment(s)
some more pictures i obtained

Don M 11-11-2013 02:42 PM

The 1920 stamp was also used to identify police property and does not indicate the pistol belonged to the Army after WWI.

klaus 3338 11-12-2013 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Don M (Post 243937)
The 1920 stamp was also used to identify police property and does not indicate the pistol belonged to the Army after WWI.

That may be but I do not think so because the 1920 stamp was published only in the "Heeres- Verordnungsblatt" and not in the "Ministerial- Blatt für die Preußische innere Verwaltung".
We can read there only about weapons of the Reichswehr (Army and not the Police).
I do not know why Police Lugers should have had a 1920 stamp at that time- they should/ may have had unit/ Police stamps.
There are many more historical reasons that Police Lugers in 1920 do not got the 1920 stamp- allone my poor English does not allow to discuss them.

sheepherder 11-12-2013 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maestro (Post 243711)
The pistol was arsenal re-finished/re-worked in 1920 where the barrel was shortened to its current length.

What leads you to think the barrel was 'shortened'??? It has the correct taper for a 100mm barrel. The receiver does have the arty notch but that does not mean the barrel was shortened...

Can you see silver solder under the front sight band???

Don M 11-12-2013 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klaus 3338 (Post 243963)
That may be but I do not think so because the 1920 stamp was published only in the "Heeres- Verordnungsblatt" and not in the "Ministerial- Blatt für die Preußische innere Verwaltung".
We can read there only about weapons of the Reichswehr (Army and not the Police).
I do not know why Police Lugers should have had a 1920 stamp at that time- they should/ may have had unit/ Police stamps.
There are many more historical reasons that Police Lugers in 1920 do not got the 1920 stamp- allone my poor English does not allow to discuss them.

Klaus, please see this thread (http://luger.gunboards.com/showthrea...property-stamp) and page 855 of the new Görtz & Sturgess book (Simpson edition). The order from the Preußische Minister des Innern was issued on 4 September 1920.

Maestro 11-12-2013 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Don M (Post 243973)
Klaus, please see this thread (http://luger.gunboards.com/showthrea...property-stamp) and page 855 of the new Görtz & Sturgess book (Simpson edition). The order from the Preußische Minister des Innern was issued on 4 September 1920.

I'll put a part of the thread here for completeness :thumbup:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Don M (Post 243973)
Police application of 1920 property stamp

In another thread on this site, I responded to a question from Jan Still about evidence that the German police, as well as the Reichswehr, were instructed to apply the 1920 property stamp. Since this reply was buried in a thread on Browning 1900s, I thought I would repeat it here for the benefit of those who look primarily at Luger postings.

Many references including Jan's Weimar Lugers and Görtz's Die Pistole 08 include the 1 August 1920 directive of the Reichswehrministerium (Ministry of War) instructing the Reichswehr to apply the 1920 property stamp to identify its weapons. Based on this document, most collectors have assumed that only the Reichswehr applied this stamp and the existence of the stamp implies Reichswehr ownership at that time. However, there is considerable evidence that similar directives were issued to state police authorities. Attached is a photocopy of an instruction issued to the State Security Police of Saxony detailing the location of the 1920 property stamp on their weapons. The illustrations are identical to those in Still's and Görtz's books from the Reichswehr document. The Saxon document was discovered by members of the German Police History Society in the state archive in Dresden and shared with me by Horst Friedrich. Although the copy is poor and a strip is missing from the middle, the first two lines of the heading appear to read, “Stempelvorschrift für Handwaffen und M.G. der L. S. Pol. aus Anlage der allgemeinen Entwaffnung der Bevölkerung.” This translates as “Stamping Instructions for hand weapons and machine guns of the State Security Police from the illustrations of the General Disarmament of the Population.” This rather clearly indicates that the Saxon police were also instructed to apply the 1920 property stamp.

Evidence that the Prussian state police received similar instructions is found on Browning M1900s and Dreyse M1907s with Imperial-era Prussian police markings and 1920 property stamps. A number of these also have Weimar-era police markings. It is inconceivable that these weapons would have been transferred from the police to the military for stamping and then immediately back to the police.

While it is a bit of an extrapolation, I believe also that the majority of the police P08s and C96s with 1920 property stamps were already in the possession of the police at the time the stamp was applied.


Maestro 11-12-2013 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by postino (Post 243969)
What leads you to think the barrel was 'shortened'??? It has the correct taper for a 100mm barrel. The receiver does have the arty notch but that does not mean the barrel was shortened...

Can you see silver solder under the front sight band???

very interesting; at this point, it's only an assumption that it was "shortened"; I will have the pistol in possession by next week and see.. in the meantime I'll see if the owner can answer this question. :thumbup:

alanint 11-12-2013 07:21 PM

If this had been an artillery, the barrel would have had to be replaced, not shortened to have the profile it has today. The gun's rear toggle would also have no sight notch.

I don't think the seller is very clear on this point.

Tony Min 11-12-2013 07:42 PM

Didn't many Erfurts have the notch?

alanint 11-12-2013 09:39 PM

ALL Erfurts had the notch.

wlyon 11-12-2013 10:16 PM

If we are talking about the front (Artillery cut) in the receiver, this appeared in 1916. Bill

Geo99 11-13-2013 01:25 AM

Ed,

After looking at the newer pictures that were posted, I would say only the toggle parts have been reblued. I see what looks like fresh blue in worn areas on the toggle. The back of the side plate looks original with white parts, but that is one of the worst looking 1917 chamber date stamps I've seen in awhile - it's shallow and looks buffed out, but is still blue?

The finish difficult to evaluate from these pictures, but in any case, it's still just a 75% original gun.

I hope the new owner really likes it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward Tinker (Post 243766)
Geo, I would want to see more before I would declare it reblued after the police.


Maestro 11-16-2013 07:19 PM

1915 Luger Artillery Holster Converted to Military Standard Luger
 
8 Attachment(s)
Assuming that this was a Artillery Luger that was shortened, would this be an appropriate holster?

wlyon 11-17-2013 12:46 AM

It sure was an artillery but the toe closure looks very poorly done. My guess is it was cut down by some owner after the War. It is not the work expected by German saddlers. There are many good Police holsters on the market. Bill

Don M 11-17-2013 05:34 PM

I doubt that any effort was made by the German police to match a reworked LP08 with a reworked LP08 holster. These would have gone through completely independent processes. A 1917 Erfurt could just as likely have been matched with a converted military P08 holster. And, as Bill says, there are many nicer reworked LP08 holsters on the market.

Maestro 11-17-2013 06:06 PM

i guess i was looking at it more in terms of the history the holster is telling just by looking at it, versus a perfect holster that would not convey the same message.

Simpson LTD had about 4 of these that are mostly missing certain things, or have tears, etc for about $150 each. This one is about $130 (no tears, nothing seems to be missing).

klaus 3338 11-22-2013 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Don M (Post 243973)
Klaus, please see this thread (http://luger.gunboards.com/showthrea...property-stamp) and page 855 of the new Görtz & Sturgess book (Simpson edition). The order from the Preußische Minister des Innern was issued on 4 September 1920.

Very interesting Don- thanks for sharing.
Can you tell me the meaning of L.S.Pol. please.
Regards
Klaus

Don M 11-22-2013 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klaus 3338 (Post 244626)
Very interesting Don- thanks for sharing.
Can you tell me the meaning of L.S.Pol. please.
Regards
Klaus

S.L.Pol. = Sächsische Landessicherheits-Polizei. This was the short-lived equivalent of the Prussian Sicherheitspolizei formed after WWI. Another document from the Dresden Archive confirms this identification. The document is reproduced on p. 213 of HWIS.

klaus 3338 11-23-2013 02:39 AM

That is what I thought... there were several "Police units" shortly after the Great War which have had more military character than Police and were disbanded by the IMKK like the PwB and all the others (in German we would say: Nicht bei allem wo Polizei draufstand war auch Polizei drin). That is a part of my first objection to the 1920 stamp on "Police" Lugers.
There is a good book about this time and the problems of the Germans with the IMKK. I got it from the late Joachim Goertz and it was basic for several discussions. I always see the Luger history with the time history and hope my poor English can be understand.
Don thanks for the reply and best regards from Germany
Klaus


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com