LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   Off Topic & Other Firearms (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=142)
-   -   Sporterized Krag (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=17555)

Karl 07-19-2007 08:24 PM

Sporterized Krag
 
http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/krag1.jpg
A new aquisition: 1898 Krag carbine on cut down rifle stock, Marble front sight blade, Redfield micrometer peep sight, excellent bore and headspacing - $285. I replaced the rotted sling, added missing safety lever (EBay), replaced recoil pad and added 3/4" of spacers to the butt.

I always wanted one of these. My father praised the Krag as a great hunting rifle due to accuracy and the fact than you can top off the magazine on the run with a round in the chamber. Ammo is in the mail. I hope to bring home some hogs with this gun come winter. KFS

Ron Smith 07-19-2007 10:34 PM

Karl,

The best damned hunting cartridge in the world. I've had several over the years. Back when you could run across the half sporterized Krags like yours for $75.00 to $125.00, I would buy them, fix them up and re-sell them. Very similar to what you have done. I even had a Ruger #1 that had been converted to a 30-30 cast bullet target rifle by a local doctor. I had it rechambered to 30-40 Krag. I killed several deer with it. Should have kept it.

I love these old Krags and the cartridge.

Ron

Edward Tinker 07-20-2007 03:02 AM

Karl, I picked up a sporterized 30-40 krag carbine 3 or 5 years ago, and it is a fine rifle. Neat design that just never got its chance.


Ed

Steinar 07-20-2007 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ron Smith
[B]Back when you could run across the half sporterized Krags like yours for $75.00 to $125.00, I would buy them, fix them up and re-sell them.
Perhaps you should come to visit and bring back a souvenir? ;)
Here is one for 136$ and two K98's for 126$
http://www.finn.no/finn/bap/object?f...46&WT.svl=Link
(nothing to do with be)
They are nice rifles.. with quite a bit of history in them. Don't like the up 'to the right'-thing about them when it rains. But besides that, it's still a good design after all those years.

Karl 07-20-2007 09:54 AM

Steiner,

It would make sense that the Krag is common in Norway. It had a much longer service life there, manufactured into the 1920's I think. When did the Norwegian army replace it? You are right about the magazine as a rain trap, I just won't hunt when it's raining.

The 30-40 Krag cartridge never caught on, despite the popularity of the weaker 30-30.
KFS

Ron Smith 07-20-2007 10:14 AM

Steinar and Karl,

I live in Oregon. Every gun is a rain trap here. If we didn't hunt in the rain, we would never get to hunt. I never noticed any out of the ordinary problems with Krags. We just shake the water out now and then.

Steinar,

I would love to pick up a few souvenirs at those prices. One of the favorite sporterized Krags I have had was a Norwegian 6.5x55. I wish I had all of them back now.

Ron

John Sabato 07-20-2007 04:29 PM

The Krag may **** on closing the bolt instead of the more modern Mauser and Springfield actions... but it is the SMOOTHEST operating bolt action I have ever handled... I have always liked them.

Steinar 07-22-2007 04:09 PM

It was a modern rifle of it's time and the bolt action is indeed smooth, but also turned the biggest weakness.
Rain into the magazine was just part of the problem. The cartridges get wet and when placed in the camber the rifle will go up to the right due to non-symetric locking knobs on the bolt. This problem is not found on the K98 that came later.
I have one myself, but since they are not legal for hunting here any more, I haven't fired it in years.. perhaps it's time to take it out again;)
Btw. 'Krag' is short for Krag J�¸rgensen. It's taken from the two constuctors, the officer Ole Herman Krag and gunsmith Erik J�¸rgensen from the norwegian army. Many thinks it is just one person..

Karl 07-23-2007 09:13 AM

Steiner,

I did not know about the offset point of impact with wet cartridges. When you initially said "up to the right thing" I thought you were just referring to the Krag magazine as compared to a standard magazine location. Since I've seen no mention of the offset on U.S. Krag internet sites, perhaps it is more pronounced with the Norwegian 6.5x55 cartridge. I also don't understand why a wet cartridge would behave differently, unless it doesn't "grip" the chamber when the fired case expands. KFS

Rod WMG 07-23-2007 05:28 PM

"I also don't understand why a wet cartridge would behave differently, unless it doesn't "grip" the chamber when the fired case expands. KFS"

I'm glad I'm not the only one who doesn't get this.

azlaw 07-23-2007 07:06 PM

Pretty much anything can affect point of impact. Water, grass, seeds, sticks, fouling, dust, oil, bugs, etc. We even have a species of bug out here in Arizona that likes to make its coccoon in small round holes - kaboom!

Water in the barrel of a rifle changes the resistance to the travel of the bullet through the barrel, thus changing the point of impact. Any material in the bore, such as powder residue or fouling, can absorb water thus increasing its size and resistance. Wet barrels can even be dangerous if there is enough water in them.

When hunting, I try to keep water out of my barrel as best I can, usually by dumping it out periodically. A couple of times the bullet in the chamber became discolored, or had a ring on it from the beginings of corrosion from water. This tells me to run a swab through the bore with a slight amount of oil on it. (This changes the point of impact too - some hunters insist on taking guns to the field with dirty bores from the sighting range) I have no idea what effect it actually has on point of impact, since I am not likely to conduct experiments. WWII GIs supposedly used condoms to keep water out of the rifle barrels, but it looks too silly for me, and the condom itself would affect the point of impact.

I have read about some bad accidents involving flooded barrels and "underwater shooting" experiments, but I have never seen one in person. A water-filled barrel is pretty much an obstructed barrel, and common sense says that this is a Bad Thing. I have heard that some guns are designed to fire underwater, but I have yet to see one do it.

H

Steinar 07-25-2007 12:11 PM

A Google search on "Krag J�¸rgensen wet ammunition" would probably end up with some results that describes it better than what I can do. I have hunted quite a bit with the rifle, but don't feel qualified to describe it in detail.. On my rifle, the differense is the length of my fist on 100m. Some have more, others less.

Dwight Gruber 07-25-2007 01:21 PM

I could only find this reference http://www.frfrogspad.com/kragrifl.htm It mentions the phenomenon, but doesn't explain it. A couple of other Q&A-type forum links quoted this source.

--Dwight

Karl 07-25-2007 01:36 PM

Quote from www.frfrogspad.com/kragrifl.htm "While it is known for having the smoothest action of any rifle, its one locking lug action was not as strong as some of the other designs which utilized 2 or 3 lugs and made it susceptible to group stringing with wet ammunition because of unequal bolt face force." I still don't get it but it seems to be true. Ballistics is weird science.
KFS

Steinar 07-25-2007 03:34 PM

Karl, I would not think much of it. It's a shame walking trough life looking at the down side of things instead of the positive. With the Krag, there is plenty of the last. Congratulations with the acquisition, the stock looks fantastic.

This is one I inherited from my grandfather
http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/25072007097001.jpg

The rear sight is removed, and a new one is welded on closer to the eye. Upper part is painted black. Probably to reduce reflection. And the extractor is worn out completely..
I'm thinking of fixing this up the rifle some day. It has killed about one hundred elg (similar to the moose) before it got 'retired' in the 90's, when it was no longer allowed for hunting.

http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/25072007098001.jpg

Rod WMG 07-25-2007 04:25 PM

Steinar, what is the bag limit on elk for you? Would the 100 total mean that multiple kills were made in the same year?

In any case it's an enviable record for an old hunting tool. I like guns with character.

Steinar 07-25-2007 05:03 PM

Rod, as I was taking it out of the closet to take the photos.. I reflected; in average 1.5 elg's every year in use by my grandfather, father or me. Ending up with about one hundred. So it's a very well used rifle! The last years I used it, I kept a screwdriver in my pocket to take out the used shell..
I learned to shoot with this rifle, so it brings out good memories:)

As to bag limit.. I set the limit on my property, about 3 cows and 2 one-year olds each year. The population is going up every year, so will probably set it up with one ox and one cow next season.
We are having some problems with cars crashing into them, so it's for better safety also

Rod WMG 07-25-2007 06:22 PM

Wow, Steinar, that's a lot of elg! I wish I had that amount to use my various guns on for research and eating. Sounds like you and your relatives are/were very good hunters.

Rifles from our early years are special for sure!

wlyon 07-25-2007 10:32 PM

My 30-40 Krag 18" barrel, full-length birdseye maple stock. Nice actions, but not overly strong. I use downloaded hand loads.

http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/p1010317_copy1.jpg

Ron Smith 07-26-2007 09:35 AM

Steinar,

Your Elk are a species of what we call Moose, I believe. Am I correct?

I recall an old photo of the rack (antlers) of the largest Elk taken in the U.S. It used to hang in a saloon in Greeley, Colorado. The rifle that it was taken with was also on the rack. It was a full dress military issue 30-40 Krag rifle.

Ron


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com