John,

It was compared to my 1906 Commercial Navy. I don't know if there's a difference between it and 1908 or 1914 models. Tom A. could probably provide a few examples.

Tracy

I would say that there is a pretty obvious difference in the manufacture of the toggle knobs...

http://boards.rennlist.com/lfupload/...nobCompare.jpg

These sights should make great reproduction Navy shooters! :)

Okay, I ran the original German e-Bay ad text through Babel-Fish...(since I lack sufficient gray matter...).

Does it seem that the maker is saying he copied this new toggle from a 1970's Mauser Navy toggle...? If yes, maybe that's why we are seeing the machining differences and that they are not nearly close enough to the historical toggles...(?)...

Here is the "translation"... :

" Here is an offer for collecting tanks, dealers and Buechsenmacher! Hintergelenk for navy Luger 1904 with 200 meters visor. Top quality, everything compound from the full manufactured, no high quality casting, not from several parts, not soldered or welded. Manufactured from a block high-quality tool steel! Gas-carburized and at the cam inductively. Even mouse conquering village was not to be manufactured in the 70's in a the position this part from the full! One used the rather large tolerances for the anniversary Luger at that time pistols of close tolerance castings had. Here it concerns quality as before 100 years! The steel quality is even still high-quality than with the original! Exact copy of the original! Series fits into each Luger, also into the late 08! Ideally to completing or to changes of a normal Luger on navy model! Special wishes possible. Inquire please! Laws please consider! "

Here is the e-Bay posted German text :

" Hier ist ein Angebot f�¼r Sammler, H�¤ndler und B�¼chsenmacher ! Hintergelenk f�¼r Marine-Luger 1904 mit 200 Meter Visier. Top Qualit�¤t, alles aus dem vollen gefertigt, kein Feinguss, nicht aus mehreren Teilen zusammengesetzt,nicht gel�¶tet oder geschweisst. Gefertigt aus einem Block hochwertigem Werkzeugstahl ! Oberfl�¤chengeh�¤rtet und an der Steuerkurve Induktivgeh�¤rtet. Selbst Mauser-Oberndorf war in den 70er Jahren nicht in der Lage dieses Teil aus dem vollen zu fertigen ! Man verwendete f�¼r die damaligen Jubil�¤ums-Luger Pistolen Feingussteile die ziemlich gro�?e Toleranzen hatten. Hier handelt es sich um Qualit�¤t wie vor 100 Jahren ! Die Stahlqualit�¤t ist sogar noch hochwertiger als beim Original ! Genaue Kopie vom Original ! Passt in jede Luger,auch in die sp�¤te 08 Serie ! Ideal zum Komplettieren oder zum Umbauen einer normalen Luger auf Marine Modell ! Sonderw�¼nsche m�¶glich. Bitte anfragen! Gesetzliche Vorschriften bitte beachten ! "

Regards,

Pete... <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" />

Here is a photo of Tom A's genuine 1904 Navy Toggle from the right side...(I don't have a clear photo of the left side) and there's still quite a bit of difference from the repro sight in my post above...

http://boards.rennlist.com/lfupload/...leftToggle.jpg

So these repro sights 'resemble' the original but could not be mistaken from an original in their current form... (and that's a GOOD THING)

A genuine 1904 Navy differs substantially from later Navy models, i.e. the 90 degree checkering and toggle lock. If anyone reproduces these, Katy bar the door!

To all,
I am beginning to feel better. I wish that we could somehow keep an abreviated write-up with pictures of the great detective work that has been done here for future reference.

I gotta go now. I have six model 1914's to put back together without having a couple of mis-matches.
Big Norm

My Compliments to tracyp
Your Photograph has also clearly shown the impact and wear point on the Toggle that disclose the undeniable mark brought about by fireing the weapon.
This is a dead giveaway on a fired Luger and there is no way to hide it.
&gt;
http://boards.rennlist.com/lfupload/...le_compare.jpg
Viggo G

Tom A. & John S, I couldn't help but notice the fireblued finish of the toggle lock part attached to the frame of the 04 Navy. This is the same finish that I had applied to my repros of this part, to distinguish them from the originals with a rust blued finish. Is it possisble that this part of your luger is a replacement or is it just the lighting on your photo. TH

Tom Heller (Lugerdoc)

The photo of the 1904 Navy Toggle Lock has much flash reflection and I did some digital magic to help clarify the knurling for comparison with the repro sight... I am sure that the "magic" also modified the appearance of Tom's Toggle Lock somewhat and modified the color tones somewhat...

I doubt that with the keen nose that Tom has for genuine collector's items (combined with what I know he paid for this magnificent Navy Luger)that Tom wouldn't have gambled on the part in question being other than genuine...

I can assure you that when the 1916 Navy comes out with these production toggles they will have appropiate wear on them and will not be looking brand new. If it was only that easy! I really do not think you realize just how good some of these are .. and will be. Three years ago one was in Kansas City that fooled everyone. Since then they have gotten better. The secret is the stepped barrel and how it was reemed, the fit and assembly of the underside of the rear toggle, the large hole on the rear connecting pin on the receiver, plus the stamping and blue. The blue and especially the straw is really good as they usually use a 1920 commercial so it has the original straw. -- All this rambling so I'll get back to the point, they won't be mint, or new, and they'll have wear and will look real unless you know exactly how to detect them you will get stung. -- Bill

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Originally posted by Lugerdoc:
<strong>Tom A. & John S, I couldn't help but notice the fireblued finish of the toggle lock part attached to the frame of the 04 Navy. This is the same finish that I had applied to my repros of this part, to distinguish them from the originals with a rust blued finish. Is it possisble that this part of your luger is a replacement or is it just the lighting on your photo. TH</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">All,
The photos were taken by forum member and good friend Albert Beliard when this pistol was in the collection of it's previous owner, a very well known and highly respected collector. The fire blue is a result of the photography only (I just pulled it off the shelf to do a double check,)
FWIW, I had been after an '04 for about 15 years and this one in particular, for about 10 years before I was in a position to move on it. In the process, I did a lot of looking, talking, listening and reading. In the process, I determined that during the early 1970's, there was a guy who was making '04's. He did such a beautiful job that at least one of his pieces was in Jan's book, which Jan states in several places. I have acquired through an anonymous benefactor, several pictures of these bogus '04's while being manufactured, including the SN, "smoke" paterns for toggle checkering, etc, etc. I even have the names of the individuals (one now deceased) for whom these pieces were made.
As I have often said, if you are going to play with the big boys, you have to do your homework, I did and was 100% confident that I could trust my judgment when I made that five figure purchase that cost more than the first house I owned.

Tom A.

Hi Tom! Your mail box is full! So my email address is: gctomeks@msn.com Thanks, till...later...GT