LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   Navy Lugers (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=134)
-   -   1916-1917 Navy Receiver Proofs (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=8576)

Silvano 07-16-2002 11:17 PM

Recently I have seen 2 1917 Navies, both are believed to be authentic, and both exhibit halo's.
I always thought that Proofs on Navy receivers were struck prior to blueing, but these 2 Lugers are evidence to the contrary. Since both Lugers are 1917's, and both exhibit rougher workmanship, I thought perhaps that this might be evidence of rushed late war production? If this is the case, can other 1917 owners please identify their production time from the serial# and maybe you can help demonstrate a pattern to this theory. <img src="graemlins/yltype.gif" border="0" alt="[typing]" />

Johnny Peppers 07-17-2002 01:01 AM

For the record, the serial number of my 1917 dated Navy is 1676ns.

Jerry Harris 07-17-2002 01:40 AM

Some impulse (probably unwise) just makes me want to say this for the record. It's hard to understand why any sensible person would stamp a blued surface. Stamping is a locally violent process guaranteed to disrupt the soft, ultra-thin film and invite the corrosion which bluing (even rust bluing) is supposed to inhibit.

Since bluing has no effect on any functional aspect of a gun, I would order MY Luger factory to do all the inspecting, testing and proofing of the barrel/receiver assembly in the white, field strip the gun, polish, blue, reassemble and ship. So there...I feel better now.

Garfield 07-17-2002 01:53 AM

Silvano:


IMHO, the two Navies that you saw, based on your describtion, would seem to be two of the many bogus Navies that are floating around.

Good Hunting

Dwight Gruber 07-17-2002 03:47 AM

I have no idea of the production date/serial number relationship, but for the record the serial# on my 1917 Navy is 8958, no suffix. It has a large toggle-pin head, no apparent proof halos, and considering the shape its in its unlikely anybody would have faked it.

--Dwight

Edward Tinker 07-17-2002 04:37 AM

Yes Dwight, but its a NAVY!

Even tho I'm Army and Army I is, those navies sure attract me! [img]biggrin.gif[/img]

John Sabato 07-17-2002 10:59 AM

Silvano,

Please check your Private Messages by visiting your profile (link is at the top of the page)

Edmond , DCB shooting 07-17-2002 02:21 PM

Hi, SN with 2 suffix letters? i thought it existed only on some STG 44 in April/ May 45?

[quote]Originally posted by Johnny Peppers:
<strong>For the record, the serial number of my 1917 dated Navy is 1676ns.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Garfield 07-17-2002 02:30 PM

Ed:

The "ns" indicates no suffix.

Regards


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com